Natfuelbilll
Senior Member
Why would 392.60(C) refer to 250.102 and not 250.122 when sizing bonding jumpers ????????????????????????????????????????????/
Cable Tray jumpers 392.60(C)
- Thread starter Natfuelbilll
- Start date
- Status
petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
It does not seem like it matters much since 250.102(D) refers you to 250.122 fro equipment bonding jumpers.
Natfuelbilll
Senior Member
If it doesn't matter much then why, as this post is asking, does 392.60 (C) point to 250.102? Maybe 392.60(C) should just come out and tell ya to go to 250.122.
- Location
- Illinois
- Occupation
- retired electrician
It is possible that the installation would require a supply side bonding jumper and not an EGC. The reference to 250.102 covers both cases.
petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
Can a ssbj be anything other than a wire type conductor?
- Location
- Illinois
- Occupation
- retired electrician
Yes, it can be a non-flexible metal raceway. That does not include cable tray, but it is is often used as such.
- Status