ron
Senior Member
- Location
- New York, 40.7514,-73.9925
Has anyone seen any disadvantages of using cablebus (NEC Article 370) versus feeder type Busway (NEC Article 368)? It will be for 480V, 5000A feeders.
if you are just running from one side of the room to another it seems unlikely that this will be less expensive than cable tray of some sort.
How does one attach a bus drop to a bunch of separate conductors in this kind of setup. just curious.
Agreed, thxYou have to use the 75? ampacity because of the lugs, but use the free-air (much higher) ampacity because it's cable bus.
The conductors just drop in and terminate onto the lugs in the SWGR like as if they were conduit and wire.
Because of the ampacity, cable tray would require tremendous derating and additional copper, or giant tray avoiding conductor proximity.
Cablebus is instead of feeder busway (not plug-in type).I think the question was related to the equivalent of using bus plugs to connect a load at an intermediate point in a run of bus duct.
Apparently cable bus is not intended for this situation?
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
I was in a project that needs the 8000a busway to be connected with a 5000a breaker, we allowed this size of the busway due to the voltage drop where we have to run 300m, due to the high cost of the busway larger than 4000a we decided to split into three parallel feeders connected to the 5000a breaker. So the busway beyond 4000a could be costly.Cablebus is instead of feeder busway (not plug-in type).
Cable bus is essentially cable in tray, except it is an engineered design that reduces the number and size of conductors required to get the desired ampacity.
Verify with the switchgear manufacturer in regards to terminations but I believe the swbd will be limited to 75 degree design. Manufacturers are working on 90deg terminations so it pays to check and not just assume.