de2
Member
- Location
- Newark, NJ
I am sure all of you have one or more objections to NEC. And I do definitely have one; 310.15(B)(7)(c).
Single family residential, calculated load is 135A.
Here is what I want; 150A OCPD with 1/0 cable (75C).
I don't feel comfortable using 310.15(B)(7)(c), 135*0.83=112A, selection #1 awg with 150A OCPD. Why would you choose OCPD based on calculated load but feeder with 0.83?
Why not chose OCPD and feeder together 0.83? Or just erase 0.83?
I see a benefit 0.83 gives, smaller cable, economical, but why keep OCPD still at %100?
I just dont get it.
Single family residential, calculated load is 135A.
Here is what I want; 150A OCPD with 1/0 cable (75C).
I don't feel comfortable using 310.15(B)(7)(c), 135*0.83=112A, selection #1 awg with 150A OCPD. Why would you choose OCPD based on calculated load but feeder with 0.83?
Why not chose OCPD and feeder together 0.83? Or just erase 0.83?
I see a benefit 0.83 gives, smaller cable, economical, but why keep OCPD still at %100?
I just dont get it.