Can I jumper the line side feed between multiple motor feeder protective devices?

AC/DC-FAN

Member
Location
Austin, TX
Occupation
Electrical Designer
I'm designing a UL-508A 480VAC motor control panel. Are there any limitations per UL 508A or NEC bringing a #8 AWG 480VAC feeder from load side of my main fused disconnect protecting the panel directly down to the line side of my first branch circuit motor feeder breaker and then jumpering #12 AWG 480VAC from that first breaker to multiple other branch circuit motor feeder breakers? The #8 AWG Feeder from the load side of my panel main is sized properly per NEC accounting for 125% of largest OPD + sum of all other motor FLA's. The #12 AWG Feeders jumpering to the other OPD's protecting the smaller motor circuits are sized for the sum of those motor FLA's as well. I know I've seen this type of jumpering done many times in the past but want to be sure I'm doing it correct per code. I'd like to not use a Power Distibution Block.
 

LarryFine

Master Electrician Electric Contractor Richmond VA
Location
Henrico County, VA
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
Are there any limitations per UL 508A or NEC bringing a #8 AWG 480VAC feeder from load side of my main fused disconnect protecting the panel directly down to the line side of my first branch circuit motor feeder breaker and then jumpering #12 AWG 480VAC from that first breaker to multiple other branch circuit motor feeder breakers?
Welcome to the forum.

The first thing that comes to mind is placing multiple wires in lugs not rated for doing that.

I'd like to not use a Power Distibution Block.
You might be able to use wire-nuts or split-bolts, but it's hard to make them look decent.
 

AC/DC-FAN

Member
Location
Austin, TX
Occupation
Electrical Designer
I made a quick sketch. Seem like the only way to attached or insert to this post is via URL. Does that sound correct?
 

AC/DC-FAN

Member
Location
Austin, TX
Occupation
Electrical Designer
I'm designing a UL-508A 480VAC motor control panel. Are there any limitations per UL 508A or NEC bringing a #8 AWG 480VAC feeder from load side of my main fused disconnect protecting the panel directly down to the line side of my first branch circuit motor feeder breaker and then jumpering #12 AWG 480VAC from that first breaker to multiple other branch circuit motor feeder breakers? The #8 AWG Feeder from the load side of my panel main is sized properly per NEC accounting for 125% of largest OPD + sum of all other motor FLA's. The #12 AWG Feeders jumpering to the other OPD's protecting the smaller motor circuits are sized for the sum of those motor FLA's as well. I know I've seen this type of jumpering done many times in the past but want to be sure I'm doing it correct per code. I'd like to not use a Power Distibution Block.

I think it is an improper feeder tap conductor if I understand what you are asking. A sketch would help.
Hi, I made a sketch but can't figure out how to attach w/o making it URL. I was thinking it may be a feeder tap rule but could not find exact verbiage in NEC to say I couldn't do this. The OCPD for each motor branch is less than 25 ft from all taps.
 

AC/DC-FAN

Member
Location
Austin, TX
Occupation
Electrical Designer
Welcome to the forum.

The first thing that comes to mind is placing multiple wires in lugs not rated for doing that.


You might be able to use wire-nuts or split-bolts, but it's hard to make them look decent.
Yes, I agree, Lugs need to be rated to accept the two wires and AWG. I'll have to look into the split-bolts, have never used them.
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
You need to follow UL508A rules which are not always the same as those found in the NEC.
What do you have against power distribution blocks?
Does your "first' breaker have power distribution lugs as an option?
 

AC/DC-FAN

Member
Location
Austin, TX
Occupation
Electrical Designer
You need to follow UL508A rules which are not always the same as those found in the NEC.
What do you have against power distribution blocks?
Does your "first' breaker have power distribution lugs as an option?
Jim, agreed. I don't see any clear direction on this in UL 508A. I have nothing against PDB's. I do have limited room in this box (retrofit), and also seems a shame to put in a PDB if it's not required by code. Definitely, there are many applications where a PDB is the only way to go, but this application is so simple.
 

petersonra

Senior Member
Location
Northern illinois
Occupation
engineer
Jim, agreed. I don't see any clear direction on this in UL 508A. I have nothing against PDB's. I do have limited room in this box (retrofit), and also seems a shame to put in a PDB if it's not required by code. Definitely, there are many applications where a PDB is the only way to go, but this application is so simple.
Pdb often have sccr issues.
 
Top