electricus
Member
- Location
- wisconsin
Dimmers are usually devices that control the voltage going to the lamp. In the first circuit you presented the dimmer could be anywhere from fully off to fully on when you close the relay contacts. The dimmers might not care for that particularly with incandescent lamps.Want to use diagram 1 instead of 2 to save on dimmer switches needed, I did not see a problem with this, does anyone else?
Also not sure how to draw a dimmer switch, anyone know?
View attachment 5976
100 watts x 3 lamps = 300 watts on 600 watt rated dimmer. Load = incandescent (LED in the future with LED rated dimmer)I would not have a dimmer switch before the relay. How many watts are you dimmer and what kind of load.
Would a dimmer even work on a relay/contactor? I would think it would act the same way that a regular dimmer hooked to a flourescent fixture would act. Once voltage is dimmed to a certain level it will shut the coil off, and release the contacts shutting the fixture off. Imo I just don't think that picture 1 will work the way that you want it to.
Good point with the "multile-lamp fixture...switch on luminaire" comment, that is exactly what it would be likeseems like diag 1 would be fine...think of it as a multiple-lamp luminaire; and the relay contacts are a switch on the luminaire
Dimmers are usually devices that control the voltage going to the lamp. In the first circuit you presented the dimmer could be anywhere from fully off to fully on when you close the relay contacts. The dimmers might not care for that particularly with incandescent lamps.
Not a good arrangements with incandescent lamps. See below.100 watts x 3 lamps = 300 watts on 600 watt rated dimmer. Load = incandescent (LED in the future with LED rated dimmer)
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I thought dimmers controlled the lamp brightness by chopping the sine wave to be more of a square wave at the peaks. Would this then reduce RMS voltage?
Most dimmers are "leading edge" in that they chop a bit out of the earlier part of the sine wave on each half cycle like this:
There are trailing edge dimmers that work by chopping off the later part of the sine wave. And yes, both work by reducing the RMS voltage.
Steady state, that's true. But what that misses is the inrush current taken by an incandescent. I've just measured one. The cold resistance is 18 times lower than what the hot resistance would be with the lamp operating at its rated power. The inference is that inrush current at rated voltage would be 18 times higher at the point of switch on. The semiconductors in the dimmer might not like that.Turning on the incandescent lamps: 1 lamp on, then 2 lamps on, then 3 lamps on should not affect the voltage of the circuit, even it is less that the normal 120 vac due to the dimmer. The lamps are wired in parallel, voltage stays the same, current will add every time another lamp is turned on.
Besoeker:
Steady state, that's true. But what that misses is the inrush current taken by an incandescent. I've just measured one. The cold resistance is 18 times lower than what the hot resistance would be with the lamp operating at its rated power. The inference is that inrush current at rated voltage would be 18 times higher at the point of switch on. The semiconductors in the dimmer might not like that.
The short answer is that I don't know. But I think the arrangement in diagram 2 ought to be OK.Would it be a problem to have the dimmer turned on all the time set to a reduced setting say 60%, and then switch the relay contact feeding it on (closed) and off (open). With this scenario there is still inrush, but there will always be even if the switch in the dimmer is used to turn the lights on/off. Will it make a difference if the power feeding the dimmer is being turned on/off instead, like in diagram 2? I agree diagram 1 is not usable, is diagram 2?
Unless it's a (bulky) rheostat, it's electronic.Besoeker:
I'm not using electronic dimmers, just the old fashion click on/off rotary knob style.