peter d said:
I've been personally involved with one of the installations. I was told that it's for energy savings.
It's been a while since I took electrical theory. How does adding a cap. bank save energy? I thought the poco charged and metered true power, not apparent power? Reactive power is not actually consumed, is it? So how would canceling it out save energy? I'm confused, obviously.
Don't the poco's charge a penalty for customers with bad PF? So the savings would be from eliminating the penalty?
Here is how I understand it without getting too complicated. VAR's flow to the motor on part of the cycle, and are returned to the source on another part of the cycle. There is a real current flow associated with this, and the real power losses are this current flow times the resistance of the wire. The longer and smaller the wire, the more the losses.
Add a capacitor, and the VAR's flow between the capacitor and motor (instead of all the way back to the source). Put too much resistance between the motors and capacitors, and again you are loosing real power.
With the capacitor, it seems like a lot more of the losses would be on the customers side of the meter. Without the capacitor, it seems like the POCO would be footing the bill for most of the losses.
Steve