azebra
Member
- Location
- COLS. OH. USA
Installing surveillance cams for a home owner. Could not find a spec on the instructions, wondering which is more common, A or B, any help would be appreciated.
My brother installed a Lorex system in his house and the cameras would not work with his pinning even though the pairs were correct on both ends. He called them and it turned out that he needed the proper termination protocol (568B) because the cameras would only work with the correct number of twists in the cable pairs. I would double check with the camera manufacturer or go with the 568B because that's a newer standard.
Installing surveillance cams for a home owner. Could not find a spec on the instructions, wondering which is more common, A or B, any help would be appreciated.
Also, never put on plugs in the field if you can help it - use jacks and patch cords
That is the absolute truth, I've been preaching that for a long time. I've been putting plugs on cables for probably 20 years so you would think I would have it down by now. But I still have to cut some off and re-do them not to mention trying to figure out which end is at fault.
-Hal
If you believe that I have a bridge I want to sell you... :lol:
568B is the most common (and oldest because it is an old WECO standard) here in the US. 568A is for compatibility with telecom especially when you punch one end down on a 66 block. Either can be used, it's just the green and orange pairs are swapped. Electricity is color blind.
Infinity- GUARANTEED he screwed up the plugs when he crimped them on.
-Hal
Have you tried EZ PRO rj45 connectors? Just about mistake proof.
Nope you're incorrect. I checked them personally with a pair tester and all of the cables tested good. We cut off the RJ45's and installed new ones using 568B and then the cameras worked.
apologies to infinity and mcgraw, but calling 8p8c jacks RJ-45 is as maddening to telecom guys as "ground up or down" threads are here.
Nope you're incorrect. I checked them personally with a pair tester and all of the cables tested good...
apologies to infinity and mcgraw, but calling 8p8c jacks RJ-45 is as maddening to telecom guys as "ground up or down" threads are here.
zbang said:YES! And the same goes for an 6p4c or 6p6c (occasionally an RJ-11, but also -12, -14, and a few others).
Extra credit: Does anybody know what a RJ31x jack is?
Most testers won't pick up split pairs. You can wire a plug any old way and as long as the other end is wired the same the tester will say good.
-Hal
Ahhh! Now there's a breath of fresh air!
Extra credit: Does anybody know what a RJ31x jack is?
-Hal
The problem as I stated earlier was that the incorrect pairs had been used so the twists per inch for each pair were incorrect.
At least for Ethernet, I can't see how that matters; the reason the rates differ is to reduce crosstalk between pairs but otherwise they're just twisted pairs.
I also don't see how the terminal equipment can actually tell the twist rates of the different pairs, but I'm not up on the low-level physics involved.