Dennis Alwon said:
Charlie wouldn't the NEC still have jurisdiction on this issue. Art. 680.8(A) says with respect to service drops conductors....
Even if that is utility own It still is a violation of NEC rules. NO.....?
I see the same issue with the cable.
90.2 Scope.
(B) Not Covered. This Code does not cover the following:
(4) Installations of communications equipment under the exclusive control of communications utilities located outdoors or in building spaces used exclusively for such installations
A CATV company is a communications company. They offer VoIP, high speed Internet service, and CATV service. They are also a recognized utility and pole owners such as electric utilities and AT&T are required by law to permit attachments. You may also wish to read the following FPN:
FPN to (4) and (5): Examples of utilities may include those entities that are typically designated or recognized by governmental law or regulation by public service/utility commissions and that install, operate, and maintain electric supply (such as generation, transmission, or distribution systems) or communication systems (such as telephone, CATV, Internet, satellite, or data services). Utilities may be subject to compliance with codes and standards covering their regulated activities as adopted under governmental law or regulation. Additional information can be found through consultation with the appropriate governmental bodies, such as state regulatory commissions, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the Federal Communications Commission.
The bottom line is that the service drops in the NEC are on the load side of the service point. If the premises wiring system has to include the service drop or service lateral, you have to know how it is to be installed and what standard it must be inspected by. In that case, it would be the NEC since it would be on the load side of the service point. This same discussion applies to communications service drops and laterals. :smile: