This one is obvious...
Rules, Policies, and Disclaimers
No information gathered from this web site shall be treated as being the opinion of an 'expert witness, and you do not have anyone's permission to present such information as evidence in any type of legal dispute.
He reported that the GFCI had the wrong polarity and that the outlet was not installed up to code (there was no waterproof casing / silicone around the outlet, just exposed drywall)
News to too. I sure would like a couple of service calls a week like that.I read the posted link. It sounds to me like the 2nd electrician came in and "fleeced" the owner. His comments are not that of a professional - gasketing is required - that is news to me.
I read the posted link. It sounds to me like the 2nd electrician came in and "fleeced" the owner. His comments are not that of a professional - gasketing is required - that is news to me.
i'd agree..... gasketing? who are we kidding here? gasketing, in a bathroom?
if you look at the smoke path, it looks like the device cooked off pretty well.
a small amount of very dense smoke from burning plastic. i'll bet a nickel
that the source of ignition was within the GFCI, seeing how the smoke
volumn was small, dense, and exuded from the openings in the device.
a thousand dollars plus to change out a GFCI? it'd be interesting to see
what he actually did for that money. besides carry it away in a sack.
randy
Sure if you are a trained fire investigator. By the evidence. Why are you thinking about knocking someone off??How can one distinguish between a fire caused by short circuit and a short circuit caused by fire?
The determination of which came first, the fire or the short, is something that is very very difficult to do and it cannot be done without some very expensive forensic testing of the ends of the conductors involved. Yes the evidence can point to the electrical short as the cause of the fire and in the absence of suspected arson that evidence would often be correct, but that is not proof that will hold up in court.Sure if you are a trained fire investigator. By the evidence. Why are you thinking about knocking someone off??
.. expensive forensic testing ..proof that will hold up in court.
And often the other side will counter with an equally impressive witness. Just like we often have differing opinions of what a code section means, forensic investigator have differing opinions on what the evidence really means.If an example of industry credentials and fees, for forensic expertise in electrical arson, can be provided:
http://www.jurispro.com/files/documents/doc-1027799775-resume.pdf