svaurez
Member
- Location
- California
Check this out!Amazing!
- Thread starter svaurez
- Start date
- Status
big john
Senior Member
- Location
- Portland, ME
Re: Check this out!Amazing!
It's also nonsense. It is a perpetual motion machine: A generator that takes 540mW to run and yet generates a 1.755W output would be able to power itself several times over and in theory could run forever. It may be a very efficient motor (hence the reported sales), but there is definitely something wrong with those numbers.
-John
It's also nonsense. It is a perpetual motion machine: A generator that takes 540mW to run and yet generates a 1.755W output would be able to power itself several times over and in theory could run forever. It may be a very efficient motor (hence the reported sales), but there is definitely something wrong with those numbers.
-John
stars13bars2
Senior Member
Re: Check this out!Amazing!
They have obviously eliminated that little problem of friction that kills most perpetual motion machines. Eliminated, hell they have harnessed and are riding that sucker and must be going to the whip.
They have obviously eliminated that little problem of friction that kills most perpetual motion machines. Eliminated, hell they have harnessed and are riding that sucker and must be going to the whip.
caosesvida
Senior Member
Re: Check this out!Amazing!
they must be using liquid helium for the bearing, no friction!
they must be using liquid helium for the bearing, no friction!
- Location
- Lockport, IL
- Occupation
- Semi-Retired Electrical Engineer
Re: Check this out!Amazing!
Actually, the entire article is fiction. Its only purpose is to sell the ?I Love Japan? T-shirts.
Actually, the entire article is fiction. Its only purpose is to sell the ?I Love Japan? T-shirts.
william runkle
Senior Member
- Location
- Michigan
Re: Check this out!Amazing!
leave the idea of perpetual motion out of the picture. But a motor that uses 80% less energy is something different, that is possible, the problem is what will it cost? And what do they use will it be a rare source of material? I personally do not have the foresight of it. And think of it this way 100 years ago the same comments were said about Henry Ford and his production line. And at that time I am sure they were saying the same thing about an incandescent light how could it replace the gas light?
leave the idea of perpetual motion out of the picture. But a motor that uses 80% less energy is something different, that is possible, the problem is what will it cost? And what do they use will it be a rare source of material? I personally do not have the foresight of it. And think of it this way 100 years ago the same comments were said about Henry Ford and his production line. And at that time I am sure they were saying the same thing about an incandescent light how could it replace the gas light?
- Status