brian john
Senior Member
- Location
- Kilmarnock, Va
- Occupation
- Retired after 52 years in the trade.
On Chicago:
I think the reason for the Change EMT requirement for residential wiring is to minimize the chance of fire, though (walking the line carefully), I have heard (no substantiation just conjecture) the Union strongly opposes any changes to this rule.
My question is what percentages of residential fires are directly related to the wiring method, and not some homeowner using 20 amp fuses in lieu of 15 amp fuses (or the preverbal penny), the electrician?s nightmare, (the spider web approach to wiring 2-3 ways adaptors with 6 cords ran under the rug), space heaters ect?
I am not against preventing fires just curious if the number of residential fires is truly limited, with EMT.
Besides wasn't the Chicago fire started by a Mrs O'leary's cow kicking over a lantern not a incasdent lamp?
I think the reason for the Change EMT requirement for residential wiring is to minimize the chance of fire, though (walking the line carefully), I have heard (no substantiation just conjecture) the Union strongly opposes any changes to this rule.
My question is what percentages of residential fires are directly related to the wiring method, and not some homeowner using 20 amp fuses in lieu of 15 amp fuses (or the preverbal penny), the electrician?s nightmare, (the spider web approach to wiring 2-3 ways adaptors with 6 cords ran under the rug), space heaters ect?
I am not against preventing fires just curious if the number of residential fires is truly limited, with EMT.
Besides wasn't the Chicago fire started by a Mrs O'leary's cow kicking over a lantern not a incasdent lamp?