code calculations

Status
Not open for further replies.

reno

Member
Regarding code calculations and specifically 220.13, Do you apply the demand factors (Table 220.13) to the continuous loads?
 
Re: code calculations

I have seen it done both ways, however I believe the correct way is to apply the demand allowances per 220.13 to the non-continuous receptacle loads and add then add the whole portion of the continuous loads.
 
Re: code calculations

That table and the paragraph that calls upon its use is limited in scope to receptacle outlets. I don?t think that the concept of ?continuous loads? applies to receptacle outlets. Or perhaps a better way to put it is that any lamp or other device that might be plugged into a receptacle outlet, and that might be turned on for more than 3 continuous hours, has already been taken into account in the 180 VA number.
 
Re: code calculations

I too have never considered applying continuous loading to receptacle, however, in Stallcup's Electrical Design Book, published by the NFPA , he clearly shows calculating receptacle loads for both continuous and non-continuous operation. This is based on the requirements of 230.42(A)(1).

I also have a Tom Henry Electrical Calculations Workbook that does not apply a continuous loading factor to receptacles.

In conclusion, I don't think one could assume or apply a continuous loading to a receptacle unless it is specifically stated or determined to be continuous by plans or specifications.
 
Re: code calculations

Originally posted by bphgravity: . . . published by the NFPA.
Bear in mind that publication by the NFPA only means that they get the money for sales of the book. It does not mean that the book bears the same weight of authority as the NEC itself.
In conclusion, I don't think one could assume or apply a continuous loading to a receptacle unless it is specifically stated or determined to be continuous by plans or specifications.
I agree. I will also submit that this requirement is not often included in the plans and specs.
 
Re: code calculations

The answer to this is in annex D. For dwellings, no (example D2b). For a store, look at example D3 which states that "had the actual lighting load been greater than table 220.3a, 125% of the actual would be used."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top