vliposky said:Seems the old forum said I could use 4/3 w/G NM conductor for 100 AMP sub panel (being fed from 100 AMP new service in this residential dwelling application...) Is this still true?
It isn't a service.Dennis Alwon said:It depends -- read art. 310.15 (B)(6). Let us know hwat you think.
Dennis Alwon said:Celtic????
Where did you get that..... What are you up to now????
iwire said:If its a sub panel it is likely 310.15 (B)(6) does not apply.
Dennis Alwon said:The Op is obviously talking about copper. 100 amps.. table 310.16 60C.. Look at #1
Plus you never have to go higher than the service conductors.
I could use 4/3 w/G NM conductor for 100 AMP sub panel
mdshunk said:Do they even make/normally stock 4-gauge NM? I thought you're generally into SER when you get that big?
infinity said:I thought that he mentioned NM cable.
Dennis Alwon said:If it is a dwelling with a 100 amp service than #4 is okay--- agreed
A sub panel for 100 amp does not have to be larger than the service conductors. It would make no sense
infinity said:You're making a few assumptions. How do you know that the service entrance conductors are #4?
Care to save me the trouble of looking up that statement?Dennis Alwon said:Plus you never have to go higher than the service conductors.
charlie b said:
Care to save me the trouble of looking up that statement?
Dennis Alwon said:If it is a dwelling with a 100 amp service than #4 is okay--- agreed
A sub panel for 100 amp does not have to be larger than the service conductors.