Re: conduit arc flash
OK. Let's make some suppositions:
</font>
- <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Suppose that the feeder to the primary did not include an Equipment Grounding Conductor, or that it was not properly connected.</font>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font>
- <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Suppose that the conduit could not serve as an EGC, either because it was not intended to be a low-impedance path back to the source (i.e., it had non-metallic connections) or because it was not properly connected.</font>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font>
- <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Suppose that the conduit did have a low-impedance path that led to planet Earth, perhaps via bonding wires to building steel to the Grounding Electrode System.</font>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font>
- <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Suppose that there was both primary and secondary protection for the transformer, and that the primary protection was set at 250% of the rated primary current.</font>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font>
- <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Finally, suppose that the resistance of the Grounding Electrode System to planet Earth was 5.75 ohms (obviously, I am looking for a limiting case here).</font>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">If there were a fault inside the conduit, from a phase conductor to the conduit itself, the 575 volt source could send a current of 100 amps (i.e., 575 volts divided by 5.75 ohms) through the conduit, through the bonding connections, into the GES, and back to the source. That would not trip the primary side overcurrent protection device, so this fault current could continue for a long time. That 100 amps flowing through the conduit could, I believe, cause the damage you described.
I can not say that this is what did happen. But one question that you "asked but didn't exactly ask" was, essentially, "Could it happen"? So my answer to that unasked question would be, "Yes, it could happen."
Furthermore, I will add that if there were a GEC within the conduit, and if there were proper bonding connections between the conduit and the GEC (at one end of the conduit, or at the other, or at both), then the fault current (from phase to conduit) would be much higher than 100 amps. It would also have lasted a far shorter time period, as the breaker would have tripped on the fault current. But could the conduit have seen the damage you described, under this set of circumstances? I am not certain, but I think it could have. So to address your specific question, "Could a proper EGC have prevented this damage to the conduit," my inclination is to say that it might not have prevented the damage.