Re: conduit fill
Originally posted by kuros: (An electrical engineer said) that I can fill my conduit to 100% capacity after I derate my wires.
There has to be a miscommunication going on here. What is meant by "100% capacity"? At first glance, it sounds like this means you can fill 100% of the interior cross-sectional area with conductors. That is nonsense. Forget about code rules, it is physically impossible to fill in 100% of a circular conduit with two or more circular conductors. Plus, it starts getting hard to pull wires, when they take up too much of the area.
I think it more likely that the engineer was using the phrase "100% capacity" to mean 100% of the conduit fill that is allowed in the tables. That is, if the table says you can fit a set of conductors into a 3 inch conduit, then it is acceptable to use a 3 inch conduit. You don't have to use a bigger one, just to give yourself some extra room. Use 100% of the allowed interior area (i.e., use all of the 40% fill).
. . . if you do the calculation with circular mills it doesn't fit
It doesn't have to. If the table says it will fit, then it is permitted. I have use the method of adding up cross-sectional areas when there were different sizes of conductors (e.g., the EGC was smaller than the ungrounded conductors). The table said that only 4 wires would fit, but I proved that 4 of this size plus 1 of this smaller size added up to less than 40%.
Of course, that type of calculation is good for an engineer working with a writing tablet and a slide rule (or am I dating myself). But I don't have to physically pull the wires. We generally don't have a feel for the ease or difficulty of pulling wires through conduit. Sometimes it is cheaper to use a larger conduit, for the simple reason that it takes less time to pull the wires.