condulets

Status
Not open for further replies.

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: condulets

2002 314.16(C)(2) allows splicing in conduit bodys if there are marked with their volume and you use table 314.16(B) to calculate the number of conductors
 

bphgravity

Senior Member
Location
Florida
Re: condulets

Sorry GoldStar, I disagree. 314.16(C)(2) states that splices, taps or devices may be within conduit bodies that are durably and legibly marked by the manufactirer with their volume, and the fill shall be calculated in accordance to 314.16(B). :eek:
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
Re: condulets

There are devices made specially for installation in conduit bodies also.

Roger
 

renosteinke

Senior Member
Location
NE Arkansas
Re: condulets

Goldstar- don't feel bad; it used to be "no;" that was before they started marking the volume on them. Indeed, older ones often had ceramic covers, with holes in them- so of course you wouldn't want to splice there.

Roger- I remember those devices; know anyone who makes them still?
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
Re: condulets

Reno, I think Hubbell, Bryant, and Crouse Hinds still manufacture these. I'll check some catologs at work tomorrow and post back here if someone doesn't before then.

Roger
 

tom baker

First Chief Moderator & NEC Expert
Staff member
Location
Bremerton, Washington
Occupation
Master Electrician
Re: condulets

I saw a condulet fitting in a mfg catalog last week, for edison base lamp. Probably was Crouse Hinds.
 

goldstar

Senior Member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
Re: condulets

This is why I love this forum..........you learn something new every day. I'm from the old school and was taught never to splice in one of these fittings. I still think, at least from the standpoint of quality workmanship, that you shouldn't.

:confused: Now, I don't mean to open up another can of worms but why would you splice in an LB ?
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: condulets

I am with you on that Goldstar, I just said it was code compliant but I have never done it, and except for devices as Roger pointed out I do not think I would.

To get the volume necessary most times you would have to upsize the conduit body in the middle of a run.
 

bphgravity

Senior Member
Location
Florida
Re: condulets

This allowance can be very convenient on long runs in tight or high traffic areas. The conduit bodies provide a pull point and a splice point at the end of a roll of wire. The finsished job looks very streamline, and others are less likely to try to "tap" into the circuit to feed some other device or equipment, as they might with a box. This becomes especially convenient with signal and control circuits.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: condulets

I don't have any of my old code books here at work, but I think at one time there was a code rule that said you could not make splices in coduit bodies that less than 3 conduit entries.
Don
 

joe k.

Member
Re: condulets

How do you total # of conductors? If 2 # 14 AWG wires are spliced with a wire nut. Is the total 2 or 4?
 
B

bthielen

Guest
Re: condulets

In the machinery manufacturing industry such as what I am involved, we spliced in condulets. This proved to be very messy and we have since changed our design standards to not allow this practice and remain compliant with code. We are now of the opinion that if it is necessary to splice, use an approved j-box, whether the condulet is approved for splicing or not. A j-box or other approved enclosure also makes finding potential splices easier. When they can be found in just about any condulet, troubleshooting problems can become a nightmare.

Bob
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top