Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

Status
Not open for further replies.

MO EE

Member
Would appreciate opinions on copper versus aluminum conductor.

Of course, the NEC allows both for building installations. But, there are some that do not like to use aluminum.

Thanks
 
Re: Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

We use literally TONS of alum MC cable for feeders all the way up to and including 750 kcmil. It's lighter and more cost effective. We always use MAC-ADAPTS at both ends and follow the maunf. instructions on handling and terminating.

More and more specifying engineers are changing job specs to permit the use of large size MC feeders, so we can be more competitive in the market.

Of course, copper will always have a place in the industry and it's use is almost required in some situations.
 
Re: Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

On a side note, (I'll guess it's been discussed in previous posts), does everyone realize that oxide inhibiting compound is not required, and I believe prohibited, on aluminum terminations? I received this information in a letter from an aluminum manufacturer at a recent inspector's meeting. MA had an amendment requiring it's use until I believe the 1993 code.
 
Re: Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

John -

I'm not sure I understand your post. Do you mean that oxide inhibiting compound is not to be applied to an aluminum termination such as a mechanical lug ? Every compression connector that we use is filled with this stuff. If this is something that the aluminum industry is recommending against, somebody better tell T&B, Burndy, et.al.
 
Re: Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

I don't think that statement is exactly accurate. Most aluminum conductor products no longer require the use of an antioxident compound, however most still recommend its use.

Here is a comment by UL,
Preliminary preparation of conductor ? Some wire connectors supply instructions for the preliminary preparation of conductors, such as use of conductor termination compound (antioxidant compound)
 
Re: Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

The memo we were given states in part:" Al/Cu connectors are tested to UL 486B:
a. UL 486B (par 7.5, p.12) "If specific instructions for assembling the conector to the conductor are furnished with the connector by the manufacturer such instructions are to be followed in the preparation of the samples, except the conductor is not to be brushed or abraded and an antioxidant is used only if the connector is pre-filled with the antioxidant.""
My point was just that I think a lot of people are under the false impression that oxide inhibiting compound must always be used when terminating aluminum conductors.
 
Re: Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

Why would you not want to use "contact paste" as we call it, on aluminum terminations. I have replaced old panels fed by aluminum SE cable where the previous installer did not use cantact paste, and there was serious oxidation on the conductors. Just the same, I have replaced old panels where the previous installer used contact paste and the conductors looked just fine. Or does oxidation not affect the integrity of the termination over its life span?
 
Re: Copper vs Aluminum conductor (Pros & Cons)

I'm not sure when the newer aluminum alloy wire was developed but it supposed to resist corrosion. As you stated
I have replaced old panels
The aluminum used in this old installation was probably not of the newer alloy type.

With that said I'll keep using Anti-oxidant along with pressure spring type connections as even the newer alloy will still expand and contract which was one of the bigger problems with aluminum.

[ January 13, 2006, 08:41 PM: Message edited by: hurk27 ]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top