Correction factor for outside exposures

Status
Not open for further replies.

bgoble

New member
Working as a plans examiner for a large municipality in the Phoenix metro area, what would be the correct approach to determine the most accurate correction factor for (2002 NEC) Table 310.16 to use for outside exposure? Also, in addition to roof or exterior wall locations, when would this correction factor be applied, in attics, direct burial applications, or...???
 
Re: Correction factor for outside exposures

Originally posted by bgoble:. . . what would be the correct approach...???
That is up to the local authority.

The Correction Factors are based on ambient temperatures. However, the NEC does not define or explain what is meant by ?ambient.? There have been some interesting discussions, and disagreements, amongst members of this Forum, regarding the meaning of ?ambient.?

The simple answer is that ?ambient temperature? is the temperature of the surrounding area. But that leaves open the question, ?Does this mean the highest temperature seen by the surrounding area at any time throughout the year, or does it mean the year-round average, or does it mean the median (i.e., halfway between highest and lowest), or is there some other and better way to determine the ?ambient temperature?? Is this, in fact, the same question that you are now asking? If so, you will get several different answers.
 
Re: Correction factor for outside exposures

A proposal was made for the 2005 Code but it didn't pass muster. The proposal was to require a 30 degree increase in ambient for outside runs of conduit because of exposure to the sun. Test data was submitted but it was from just one area of the country and was considered flawed because of the way it was done. Without looking anything up, I think a task group was formed to look into it further for the next Code cycle.
 
Re: Correction factor for outside exposures

Charlie,
That information did make it into the 2005 code as FPN #2 to 310.10.
Don
 
Re: Correction factor for outside exposures

UH OH :eek: Well . . . OK . . . but it didn't make it into mandatory language. :D

I think they are looking into it further. I suspect it will make it into mandatory language in the 2008 edition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top