Current Limiting Fuses and Article 240

Status
Not open for further replies.

bozosboss

Member
I am working on a project that will result in the removal of a panelboard which has all molded case breakers for branch circuit protection, typically 20A, 1-pole breakers. In place of the "breaker" panel a fused panelboard will be used. All fuses are 150V, fast-acting, current limiting type. Question - Can current limiting fuses be used in lieu of the breakers? Does this satisfy the intent of Article 240? Comparing a 20A MCCB time-current curve with a 20A current limiting fuse curve indicates that the current limit fuse would likely never open under an overload condition say 150% or so but will respond faster than the MCCB for short circuit conditions.
The reason for the replacement from MCCB to fuse is that the panels are fed from UPS systems which is an energy limited electrical source. Fast clearing of a branch circuit fault results in less disturbance of the UPS electrical system. Also - this system is in a chemical plant. All branch circuit loads are instrumentation and the loss of power to the instruments could put the plant in an "upset" condition.
 
Re: Current Limiting Fuses and Article 240

The new fused panel is somewhat larger than the existing. The panels come equipped with a molded case switch in series with a fuse holder. The new panel must be removed to allow for the installation of the new fused panel.

The fuses do not appear to provide overload protection, only short circuit protection. So this seems to violate Article 240. Is that correct?
 
Re: Current Limiting Fuses and Article 240

The new fused panel comes equipped with a molded case switch in series with each fuse holder. The panel is wider to take this into account and available installation space is barely acceptable.

It does not appear to me that the use of fast-acting, current limiting fuses(not dual element fuses, but 1/4cycle semiconductor protection type fuses)provides the overcurrent protection required in Art. 240. They do provide short circuit protection for sure and they do protect the power quality of the UPS output when a short circuit occurs, but they do not appear to provide overload protection. Most all branch circuit wiring is #12 AWG, THHN/THWN. What is your take on this? Is this a violation of Art. 240?
 
Re: Current Limiting Fuses and Article 240

You can use a fused switch panel in lieu of a CB panel. I didn't realize that they were still available in that small size.
A UPS will contribute approximately 300% of fault current during a short. At that level, I do not believe that you would see significant performance differences. Actually solid state adjustable circuit breakers (with inst at minimum) would provide faster instantaneous protection than a fuse in many cases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top