Customer Owned Padmount Transformers Feeding Transfer Switch - Supply Side Bonding

Status
Not open for further replies.

whiggins

Member
Location
Kansas
There are two medium voltage services from the utility to the customer. These are used to feed two customer-owned padmounted 480/277V transformers. These transformers feed an outdoor service entrance rated, 400A, 3-pole transfer switch. The transformers are located on a common pad and have a common ground ring. The transfer switch is strut mounted with a ground rod triad. The conduits from the transformers to the transfer switch are direct buried PVC. The customer owned transformers are considered SDS.

The plan was to make a N-G connection at each transformer and a N-G connection at the transfer switch with no supply side bonding jumpers in the conduits (phase and neutral conductors only). This seems to be allowed by 250.30(A)(1)Exception 2. Is my thinking correct here? The exception mentions parallel paths. The concern became the neutral from both systems are connected at the transfer switch and at the common ground ring at the transformers. In a fault condition current could return on both neutrals to the one transformer. Is the connection to a ground ring considered a parallel path?

In further thinking we don't need the neutral at the transfer switch. There are no neutral loads. Are we required to take the neutral to the transfer switch from an SDS transformer? I know for a service transformer yes, but I can't find a requireement for an SDS transformer. Can a N-G connection be made at each transformer with 3 phase and 1 supply side bonding jumper (no neutral) to the transfer switch? Because there are no neutral loads it seems the same as the original scenario except a different color on the wire.

Any thougs are appreciated, my head now hurts.
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
You can avoid the question by using a transfer switch that also transfers the neutral.
You should still not bond neutral to ground at both the source and the transfer switch.

If you do not bring the neutrals to the switch, you certainly do not have to bond them there, and bonding both at their respective sources cannot lead to normal current traveling over the grounding conductors.
 

publicgood

Senior Member
Location
WI, USA
Customer Owned Padmount Transformers Feeding Transfer Switch - Supply Side Bonding

4-pole switch, as golddigger said if you bring neutrals to the transfer switch. The service entrance rating will include the N-G link.

Since these are customer owned pad mounts, you do not have to take the neutral. If they were utility owned, they would make you take the neutral up to the meter. You would need to take a neutral if your service was over 1000A since it is over 150V-G; it would be needed for ground fault sensing.
 
Last edited:

whiggins

Member
Location
Kansas
Assuming we bring the neutrals to the transfer switch (no neutral load) and make the neutral to ground connection there
and not at the transformers, can these neutrals be reduced in size?

I've reviewed the tap rules for transformers and cannot find a reference that would allow
for a neutral reduction. Feeders Article 215.2(A)(2) allows reductions per table 250.122 which
would be a #3 (400A breaker). The SSBJ would be a 1/0 per table 250.102(C)(1) (600 kcmil).

I would think that the SSBJ and neutral would be the same size. What am I missing here?
 

augie47

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Tennessee
Occupation
State Electrical Inspector (Retired)
A couple of comments:
Be careful of the Code cycle involved. The '11 Code did not exempt the use of a Supply-Side bonding jumper in this situation (The '14 caught the oversight)
Does 250.30(A)(1) Exception not state be that the Neutral would be sized not smaller than the
system bonding jumper which would be sized by 250.66 {or 250.102(C) in the '14} ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top