derate

Status
Not open for further replies.

wannabe

Member
could someone explain to me the proper way to downsize wire,according to "current carriers"?. I have heard so many variations! Please help
 
Re: derate

NEC-2005 210.3 Rating. Branch circuits recognized by this article shall be rated in accordance with the maximum ampere rating or setting of the overcurrent device. ...
You derate by placing a lesser-rated breaker supplying the branch circuit.

Not sure what you need, hope that helped.

[ March 17, 2005, 12:20 AM: Message edited by: georgestolz ]
 
Re: derate

Article 310 Conductors for General Wiring

Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) provides adjustment factors based on the number of current carrying conductors with reference to tables 310.16 through 310.19 .

In other words, you start with table 310.15(B)(2)(a) and find the adjustment factor you need to apply. Then you go to tables 310.16 through 310.19 (which ever applies) and find the conductor size you'll need after applying the adjustment factor.

In your case there are 12 current carrying conductors. Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) says the adjustment factor you need to apply is 50% for 10 to 20 current carrying conductors.

Your conductors will be in a raceway. Go to Table 310.16.

You need 20 amps at 50% ampacity. 10 AWG is 40 amps in the 90? C. column. 50% of that is 20 amps.

In your example you are correct. 6 twenty amp circuits in one conduit will require at least 10 AWG conductors.

[ March 17, 2005, 03:34 AM: Message edited by: physis ]
 
Re: derate

I see what's going on here
feiertag-smiley-013.gif
 
Re: derate

The process above is correct but I think Bryan is trying to get to the point that you can combine the neutrals and only have (8) current carrying conductors (6 hots and 2 neutrals) in which case 70% of 30A (#12 THHN 90 Deg C Column) is 21A. So a #12 THHN is acceptable.
-Ed
 
Re: derate

I agree Bryan.

I assumed 12 conductors because the example indicated that might be the scenario.

And it's also clearer to use two wire circuits.
Multiwire circuits would add an extra parameter to explain.

I do agree it could have been mentioned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top