electrofelon
Senior Member
- Location
- Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
Ok guys, need further help with this air compressor. The utility is asking for the locked rotor current. I do not see this information anywhere nor a nema code letter on the motor. Here is the motor dataplate.
It is. Maybe the OP could offer an estimated figure. Who will test its accuracy?Isn't the rule-of-thumb 6 or 7 times FLA?
Isn't the rule-of-thumb 6 or 7 times FLA?
I would but state it as an estimate.Right, that is typical. Should I just guess?
That’s not a NEMA compliant nameplate, otherwise it would provide you with the Locked Rotor kVA code number. You could call Weg and ask them for it, but good luck with that.
On something that small, I would just guesstimate it at 600% of FLA.
Since I'm in the office I took a quick peek at WEG's web site. This motor is a very odd duck and the closest I could find was this:
http://ecatalog.weg.net/redirect/index.asp?p_Categoria=490&p_Produto=471&p_Table=YES
You'll have to filter to find the 30 HP motors. I picked the one operating at 3,600 RPM.
It lists the locked rotor as "(II/In)=9.5"
Yeah, this is a foreign machine I believe
What does that mean?
II instantaneous current
In normal current
so 9.5x the marked 60 Hz value ... for a SIMILAR motor ... so a good estimate would be that ... but give it as an estimate unless WEG will give you a better number.
Oh ok. Thanks. Wow that's pretty high.
I agree. When I had to provide system efficiency guaranteed figures at the bid stage I noted the differences. It also impacts on starting/locked rotor currents.Not sure if it applies here or not, but in general "high efficiency" motors have higher inrush because of the design changes such as lower winding DC resistance made to increase efficiency.
A distinction not often appreciated.there is a difference between "instantaneous / inrush current" and "locked rotor current".
there is a difference between "instantaneous / inrush current" and "locked rotor current".
Jraef: Please expand on this difference...is instantaneous / inrush current a manufacturer design parameter ?
Regarding "LRC", I thought we are directed by 430.110 steering us to use values in back of 430. Is this not the direction for the original question ?
Jraef: Please expand on this difference...is instantaneous / inrush current a manufacturer design parameter ?
Regarding "LRC", I thought we are directed by 430.110 steering us to use values in back of 430. Is this not the direction for the original question ?