I note that the Lutron PDF that I link to above claims that standard incandescent dimmers are not listed to have to have symmetrical forward phase-control waveforms.brantmacga said:standard incandescent dimmer's use forward phase control, and are therefore compatible with MLV's.
al hildenbrand said:Leviton makes nice dimmers, no doubt.
In the world of standard solid state incandescent dimmers, there are a lot of lesser quality than Leviton or Lutron and more limited electronics.
al hildenbrand said:If a standard solid state incandescent dimmer has equal positive and negative forward phase-control waveforms, and the product literature attests to it, then it will probably also be listed for use with a magnetic low voltage transformer.
The cheap incandescent dimmer won't have equal + & - waveforms, and one runs afoul of 110.3(B).
I think a chunk of Lutron's quality $$ premium goes into plates & colors & designer features, as much, if not more than the electronics. But I'm probably not a fair judge as my exposure to Leviton's line is less than my exposure to Lutron.brantmacga said:I think we've just found an instance where that code can be abused by a manufacturer.
