Disconnect/Subpanel

Status
Not open for further replies.
A sub-panel isn't defined by the NEC what's the reason that you may need to define what it is?
 
A sub-panel isn't defined by the NEC what's the reason that you may need to define what it is?

I gather he's asking if it's considered a disconnect or a subpanel.

Spas often have a single 2p breaker and they are disconnects, and I suppose a subpanel as well. Maybe the question is can you omit the neutral (to either) on a straight 240V load, or re: bonding/grounding, especially at a separate structure.
 
OK, here is what I saw in the basement of a resident the other day when I was troubleshooting another circuit.

A 100 amp SER, four wire was feeding a detached garage. This circuit was taped in the basement in a jbox. The tap run about 8 feet and ended in a disconnect with a thirty amp two pole breaker. The disconnect was fed with three wires from the jbox,, no egc. Thls disconnect fed a three wire clothes dryer receptacle.

It seem wrong to me.
 
OK, here is what I saw in the basement of a resident the other day when I was troubleshooting another circuit.

A 100 amp SER, four wire was feeding a detached garage. This circuit was taped in the basement in a jbox. The tap run about 8 feet and ended in a disconnect with a thirty amp two pole breaker. The disconnect was fed with three wires from the jbox,, no egc. Thls disconnect fed a three wire clothes dryer receptacle.

It seem wrong to me.
If it was done before 1996 NEC applied it may have been OK. After then it at least needed a separate EGC.

Not really certain if you could bond such a disconnecting means with the neutral back in those days, but it was done a lot when fuses were common instead of breakers.
 
If it was done before 1996 NEC applied it may have been OK. After then it at least needed a separate EGC.

Not really certain if you could bond such a disconnecting means with the neutral back in those days, but it was done a lot when fuses were common instead of breakers.
It needed the separate EGC back then too....the only time you could omit the EGC for a dryer or range circuit was when the circuit originated at the service equipment.
 
It needed the separate EGC back then too....the only time you could omit the EGC for a dryer or range circuit was when the circuit originated at the service equipment.

What about that rule using a insulated grounded conductor, did it apply then also?

The grounded conductor is insulated, or the grounded
conductor is uninsulated and part of a Type SE service-
entrance cable and the branch circuit originates at the
service equipment.

I omitted the other qualifiers on purpose.
 
What about that rule using a insulated grounded conductor, did it apply then also?



I omitted the other qualifiers on purpose.

OP stated SER cable and taped a insulated grounded conductor. In addition to the need of originating from the service equipment i don't remember one being able to tap SER cable in this way.

SER cable to a detached garage would imply other metallic paths to the structure kicking in the need for a four conductor feeder
 
It needed the separate EGC back then too....the only time you could omit the EGC for a dryer or range circuit was when the circuit originated at the service equipment.
You are probably correct. Around here the only 4 wire range/dryer circuits you ever saw was in mobile or manufactured homes, until the 1996 NEC came out, service or feeder supplied panel didn't really matter. Three wire feeders to separate structures was also normal regardless of other conditions.

But one must also know that single family dwellings typically were not inspected until about 1992 or 1993 from what I remember, and even us professionals that did try to follow code were not as on top of it as we became once they started inspecting nearly everything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top