petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- Semi-retired engineer
is one permitted to have an outside disconnecting means in the service conductors prior to the place where a service conductor is grounded?
(B) Main Bonding Jumper. For a grounded system, an unspliced main bonding jumper shall be used to connect the equipment grounding conductor(s) and the service-disconnect enclosure to the grounded conductor within the enclosure for each service disconnect in accordance with 250.28.
petersonra said:is one permitted to have an outside disconnecting means in the service conductors prior to the place where a service conductor is grounded?
You would have to do your grounding there it is your first disconnect means.wbalsam1 said:I'll say YES just to be different. :grin: How about the meter "disconnect" permitted on the supply side of the service disconnect as per 230.82(3) ?
I tend to think of it opposite as in bring the grounding to the disconnect but then you have to isolate/insulate grounds/neutrals past the main.Pierre C Belarge said:I think this is an interesting question, it is not something we necessarily think about on a regular basis.
The NEC requires the first means of service diconnecting means to be where grounding is provided.
My question to peter is, will there be a different (additional means) disconnect installed after your other disconnecting means outside?
quogueelectric said:You would have to do your grounding there it is your first disconnect means.
tryinghard said:Nope, unless you mean latter (opposite prior) as in the service disconnect enclosure, 250.24
Nice diagram , But I don't see the case for the first disco not to have the GEC.
I don't see the issue to have a disconnect outside with the meter (meter w/main) and all the branch breakers in the Dry full height basement or garage. This allows for service during bad weather or cold nights. I the old day's they POCO allowed the meter outside with no Disco. Now they frown on it.
Am I missing something?
wbalsam1 said:The term "accessible" comes into play through 250.24(A)(1).
A quorum doesn't always mean it is correct.Sierrasparky said:I think we have that Quarum
Sierrasparky said:Never seen that done her or in nearby states. Wha you seem to do seems like it could present different ground paths.
I was always under the knowledge that the GEC's must originate at the same point.
I suppose I could be wrong