mbrooke
Batteries Included
- Location
- United States
- Occupation
- Technician
Is breaker and a half more reliable then double breaker double buss? I am starting to get the idea the old notion is a myth :blink:
If a painter and a half could lay an egg and a half.....
What is "a breaker and a half" please?
This is a pretty good comparison.
http://www.ece.umn.edu/class/ee5725/SubstationReliability.pdf
This is a pretty good comparison.
http://www.ece.umn.edu/class/ee5725/SubstationReliability.pdf
Depends on whether you are defining reliability in terms of odds of any component failing, odds of a failure disabling any load or group of loads, or resilience in terms of ease of doing maintenance with minimal impact on the loads.It alludes to double breaker double buss being the most reliable, but I am willing to question that. IMO, breaker and a half might be superior.
Depends on whether you are defining reliability in terms of odds of any component failing, odds of a failure disabling any load or group of loads, or resilience in terms of ease of doing maintenance with minimal impact on the loads.
Id say breaker and a half beats all of the above. For example, it is impossible (at least far less likely) to loose both buss bars in a breaker and a half scheme.
You are correct. You have the option as to which element you need to shutdown/take out for maintenance, hence your failure rates will be reduced.
Experience-wise, we were also able to re-configure our breaker and 1/2 busses to have a one-on-one, generator to load arrangement. Both busses were isolated from the load-generator connections-->both busses disconnected at side breakers and keeping the center breaker energized. We were told to make sure we will have a generator left feeding the station load, to survive a very strong storm!
Exactly what I was thinking. And in the real world if a buss is taken from service and the other is lost for what ever reason, the center breakers can still link 2 circuits together. Intelligent planing can have circuits pared in such a way that generation (source) circuits feed load circuits. Heck a 345/138kv autotransfomer can still feed a critical transmission line even with both busses cleared.
In your case, why were both bus bars taken from service?
The rest of the feeders/generators were actually "on" through the other paths of the two busses. We were expecting the possibility of feeder lines to be brought down to the ground as storm winds were quite strong, hence a blackout in the offing. Only those generator-load pair were secured so we don't have to be doing a cold start after the storm, it worked fine.
The breaker and half scheme is a bit complicated protection system.