Dry-Type Transformer Testing after Fault Need Advice on

Status
Not open for further replies.

jryan

Member
I had a fault in the switch of a 1000KVA dry-type transformer during some rain when water got in the switch. It flashed over in the switch and took the OCB out upstream (13.8kV) and the main OCB(115kV).

This transformer is one of two paralleled 1000kVA units that are over 50 years in age.

After disconnecting this substation 2-1000kVA units, re-energizing the 15kV circuit and powering the other subs in line, I wanted to get some testing of these 1000 kVA units before bringing them back online after the switch is repaired. It looks to have just 'marked' up the insulators and other minor damage. I think the OCB caught the fault in time.

Well these test on these 2 units came back fine as far as the Turns ratio tests (within 0.5% calculated) and the Winding resistance tests (1.45-1.49 M-ohm).

The problem was the Insulation resistance testing.
The 2 units had sat OFF for about 8 days and it has been wet outside. Even though these units are indoors, I feel that they have cooled and taken on a bit of moisture. They are dusty so I am cautious about blowing air on them and further take the chance of damage. The Last time we did this to one, it failed when energized.

The results came back in the 1-2 M-ohm range @5kV and less then 1 M-ohm @1kV. I then had the tester, unhook both the primary AND secondary to totally isolate the transformer and retest. The results changed a little to 3-4 M-ohms @5kV but that does not come close to the needed 1 per KV + 1 general rule. I need to see 10-15M-ohm to be comfortable but I doubt I would ever see this. The only records I can find dates from 1997 and 2003. The 2003 results have some issues with the way the tester present the info.

(2003)
H-L & GND (30-sec)
He lists the values as (1)1350k and (2)7000k

I read this as 1.35 G-ohm and 7 G-ohm
(I really think these values are junk, but who knows? I mean 50 years and 7 G-ohms?)


(1997)H-L & GND (30-sec)
The values are listed (2)15M-ohm and (1)1000M-ohm


The results of my testing now are just 1-4 M-ohm for the same test. I am worried because I can not see the fact that they have been off 8 days and picked up some moisture could have that large of an effect. Since the other test results came out fine, this one puzzles me and I do not feel comfortable in re-energizing them, but time is not on my side. I do not have the funds to replace them as of now. I have temp power run to the critical loads that are fed from these units so I have some headroom.

Does anyone have some advice as to what these numbers mean? I can not seem to find anything online for older units other than the kV rating plus 1 for a result.

I plan to put some heaters in the rooms and 'cook' the transformers and re-test, but I doubt it would raise the results to 15M-ohms...


Thank you for your help

[ November 12, 2004, 01:30 PM: Message edited by: jryan ]
 
Re: Dry-Type Transformer Testing after Fault Need Advice on

The 2003 results have some issues with the way the tester present the info.

(2003)
H-L & GND (30-sec)
He lists the values as (1)1350k and (2)7000k

I read this as 1.35 G-ohm and 7 G-ohm
(I really think these values are junk, but who knows? I mean 50 years and 7 G-ohms?)


(1997)H-L & GND (30-sec)
The values are listed (2)15M-ohm and (1)1000M-ohm
wouldn't that be 1.350Meg and 7.000Meg
and 15Meg and 1.000Gig

can't help much beyond that, but it may put things in the ballpark for you.
 
Re: Dry-Type Transformer Testing after Fault Need Advice on

That is the way I would read it, 1997 the xfmr tested around 25Mohm.

I do not feel safe energizing the units, when the only megg at ~2Mohm, maybe some damage was done.

[ November 17, 2004, 02:24 PM: Message edited by: jryan ]
 
Re: Dry-Type Transformer Testing after Fault Need Advice on

J
I would consider a Hi Pot test. Since the transformer is operating at 13.8 kv, there may be a problem but the 5kv test is not showing it. If there is an insulation defect the Hi Pot test would show it.
 
Re: Dry-Type Transformer Testing after Fault Need Advice on

Wouldnt the Hi-Pot be risky with a 50 yearold unit? Maybe Hi-pot to 15KV only?
 
Re: Dry-Type Transformer Testing after Fault Need Advice on

Jryan
It might be risky but you are in a jam now. Yes you could use 15 kv but it is DC if that the kind of test equipment you are using. Generally you can go 4 times the AC level when testing cable but I agree that it should be a lower lever. I would put 5 kv for 10 minutes and get you leakage reading and then up it in steps. If the insulation is bad you will see the leakage current begin to rise rapidly.
 
Re: Dry-Type Transformer Testing after Fault Need Advice on

Well the temperature at the time was around 65F and that is pretty close to 20C. The Tables that I can find show that I should get a 25k Mohm reading and I am not even in the ballpark.

This has me worried as the age of the unit can account for some deterioration but not that much. The question is why both transformers read so low. I am begining to question the testing and whether it was done correctly or not.

I think a Hi-Pot test would drive the units to fail, but maybe not. The age of these xfmrs leads me to think that the insulation is dirty.

We have had 2-3 of these type "Moloney" units fail in the last 10 years so maybe it is time for these units to go also.

At 40C the readings should be near 16Mohm, but since it was 20C and moist, the adjustment factor would be 2.5, so 16/2.5 = 6.4Mohm min.

H-L&GND = 2.56 mohm after 10 minutes xfmr1
H-L&GND = 4.1 mohm after 10 minutes xfmr 2

These are just to low I think but at 50 years?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top