Dual Phase

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the same way that the diameter of a 1" pipe is not 1", the 2 out of 3 situation is 'nominally' single phase.

It isn't really single phase, but it is used like single phase and is called single phase.

Jon
I count phases by the number of L-L voltages, so I have no problem with this terminology.
 
For a while now I've been working with 'high phase order' motors.

We got some interesting results specifically playing with the different L-L voltages available. 8 different voltages available in a 17 phase system, with 17 different phase angles at each voltage :)

Jon
 
It isn't really single phase, but it is used like single phase and is called single phase.
Sure is single phase. Two phases would show as two sine waves on an oscilloscope. When you hook the leads to the 240 connection, you see one sine wave. Keeping one lead in place, move the other lead to the neutral. Still see one sine wave. Therefore single phase.
 
Sure is single phase. Two phases would show as two sine waves on an oscilloscope. When you hook the leads to the 240 connection, you see one sine wave. Keeping one lead in place, move the other lead to the neutral. Still see one sine wave. Therefore single phase.
No matter what two wires you connect to you will see only a single phase on a single trace scope.
If you trigger off L1-N for a consistent time reference you will see the same or 180 different phase for all other connections on a 120-0-120 split phase.
If you do the same on a 2 out of 3, which was Jim's subject in post #7, you will see a 120 degree phase difference.

If you have a dual trace scope and trigger consistently off one channel, dual phase will show a 0 or 180 degree shift
With the same dual trace scope and trigger setup a 2 out of 3 source will show a 120 degree offset.
 
Not if you follow my method of ignoring the common/neutral wire and transformer taps, so effectively only the highest L-L voltages are counted.
If I understand your counting stratagy and Philly 5 wire two phase you have:
  1. 240V between a - aa
  2. 240V between b-bb
  3. 170V a-b
  4. 170V a-bb
  5. 170V aa-b
  6. 170V aa-bb
The center tapped neutral is not counted and is 120V to all phases like a star 208Y120
 

Attachments

  • two_phase_5_wire.png
    two_phase_5_wire.png
    21.3 KB · Views: 6
If I understand your counting stratagy and Philly 5 wire two phase you have:
  1. 240V between a - aa
  2. 240V between b-bb
  3. 170V a-b
  4. 170V a-bb
  5. 170V aa-b
  6. 170V aa-bb
The center tapped neutral is not counted and is 120V to all phases like a star 208Y120
And only two of those voltages are 'high' so that is all I would count. The other four voltages would be used to determine the actual system configuration beyond the simple number of phases.
 
If I understand your counting stratagy and Philly 5 wire two phase you have:
  1. 240V between a - aa
  2. 240V between b-bb
  3. 170V a-b
  4. 170V a-bb
  5. 170V aa-b
  6. 170V aa-bb
The center tapped neutral is not counted and is 120V to all phases like a star 208Y120
Wow. If we would have gone to four phases instead of three we could have gotten around the whole stupid square root of three thing. :D
 
Not if you follow my method of ignoring the common/neutral wire and transformer taps, so effectively only the highest L-L voltages are counted.
That rule works nicely for most cases, but it would call 2-phase 3-wire "single phase", as there is only one L-L voltage, and that is higher than either L-N voltage.

Cheers, Wayne
 
That rule works nicely for most cases, but it would call 2-phase 3-wire "single phase", as there is only one L-L voltage, and that is higher than either L-N voltage.

Cheers, Wayne
Yeah.
But I use it as a working rule of thumb, not as an absolute for esoteric systems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top