While it's been a while since I've watched a home-improvement show, I remember noticing that a lot of them don't talk about electrical work in any detail. Maybe the lawyers eased them away from that for liability reasons.Originally posted by hbiss:
...And to a lesser extent stores like Home Despot and shows like This Old House.
The local Despot has a bit supply of Cutler BR breakers and a sign on the wall saying they'll "fit" in [a whole list of stuff]. Indeed they will, but a sharp eyed inspector might balk. They could have just stocked the "CL" line instead, then their goofy sign might be closer to something legal...Originally posted by big john:
I think it's absolutely rediculous that hardware stores even give out installation advice in the first place
it does seem to have that effect, but only to us. The DIYer would be looking for a diferent reason.Well now you have me wanting to look but to many DIY sites without a specific link.
Generally, I can class stories into two types of people:</font>...Anyway, i have my outdoor plug hooked up and in use now. I have chosen not to have GFCI plug.....to each his own....
------------------------------------------------on Sun, Aug 17, 03 at 12:29
There actually is a rule of law if the circuit is a general lighting circuit in a dwelling. Each outlet on a general lighting circuit must be calculated at 1.5 amps. That means that a 15-amp circuit can support no more than 10 outlets. A 20-amp general lighting circuit can support no more than 13 outlets. You can use less but you cannot use more. Many dwellings exceed this requirement because of general ignorance of the 1.5 amp rule. Many of the circuits in a dwelling are devoted to lighting. There are other specialized circuits that must be sized to the actual load. The number of lighting circuits is not only dictated by the number of lighting outlets, but also by the square footage of the dwelling.
Also, please take note that even in error the initial post errs within the confines of safety. The initial post is factually wrong but is not unsafe.Section 220-3(b)(9) requires that receptacles in other than dwelling units be computed at 180 voltamperes each.
I don't think that is what he means because if that were the case, even when he is right, he would not be believed . . . HMMM . . .Originally posted by Pierre:
Are you saying it is okay to be factually wrong as long as it is not unsafe?
No.Originally posted by pierre:
Wayne
Are you saying it is okay to be factually wrong as long as it is not unsafe?
Pierre
It is certainly OK to exceed the requirements.Originally posted by awwt:
It's OK to do things that exceed factual requirements.
Safe or not wrong info is still wrong info.please take note that even in error the initial post errs within the confines of safety. The initial post is factually wrong but is not unsafe.