Chapter 2, Article 250, Part I, Section 250.1; gives us the definition of "Effective Ground-Fault Current Path".
Question: Where in the National Electrical Code, do you get guidance in constructing this "Effective Ground-Fault Current Path"?
I think the answer is in, proper Electrical Engineering Design outside the Code, but here is the problem..... Electrical Inspectors, Electrical Contractors, Electricians, ect. can not seem to understand that compliance with the NEC includes proper Electrical Engineering.
Example: #14-2 W/G Non-metallic sheathed cable (Romex). Ampacity 15 amps with a 15 amp circuit breaker. NO ATTENTION is given to the length of this circuit. NO ONE CARES IN TEXAS! How can the circuit "Equipment Grounding Conductor" provide an "Effective Ground-Fault Current Path", if the total circuit is 150 feet or MORE in length???
The rule for "Voltage Drop" was moved from a section (210-6), to a Fine Print Note in the 1975 NEC. Compliance with this requirement made the circuit comply, but NOW no AHJ seems to care.
Comments Please.
Question: Where in the National Electrical Code, do you get guidance in constructing this "Effective Ground-Fault Current Path"?
I think the answer is in, proper Electrical Engineering Design outside the Code, but here is the problem..... Electrical Inspectors, Electrical Contractors, Electricians, ect. can not seem to understand that compliance with the NEC includes proper Electrical Engineering.
Example: #14-2 W/G Non-metallic sheathed cable (Romex). Ampacity 15 amps with a 15 amp circuit breaker. NO ATTENTION is given to the length of this circuit. NO ONE CARES IN TEXAS! How can the circuit "Equipment Grounding Conductor" provide an "Effective Ground-Fault Current Path", if the total circuit is 150 feet or MORE in length???
The rule for "Voltage Drop" was moved from a section (210-6), to a Fine Print Note in the 1975 NEC. Compliance with this requirement made the circuit comply, but NOW no AHJ seems to care.
Comments Please.