Fitzdrew516
Senior Member
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
I'm going to try to explain this to the best of my ability. See attached sketch for reference -
I have always worked with individual lights/exit signs with internal battery packs so this is a new area for me. I'm searching through 700 and trying to get an answer for my question, but no luck as of yet. Is a set up like this permissible per code?
Basically the idea is to serve an emergency panel from a genset and ATS. In the example I'm showing normal lighting in a room fed from a separate panel (panel A) and a dedicated emergency circuit coming from the emergency panel (panel X).
The potential issue I see with this is that if you lose power somewhere downstream of the ATS or downstream of panel X (EM branch circuits), that would be a way in which you would not be guaranteeing egress lighting in these areas. So then if you lost the normal lighting circuit in that area you would have a situation where there would be no lighting at all. Is this just accepted in the code as a "that's a very unlikely situation" or is this not allowed per code?
Can someone offer any clarification or point me in the right direction here?
Thanks,
- Drew
I have always worked with individual lights/exit signs with internal battery packs so this is a new area for me. I'm searching through 700 and trying to get an answer for my question, but no luck as of yet. Is a set up like this permissible per code?
Basically the idea is to serve an emergency panel from a genset and ATS. In the example I'm showing normal lighting in a room fed from a separate panel (panel A) and a dedicated emergency circuit coming from the emergency panel (panel X).
The potential issue I see with this is that if you lose power somewhere downstream of the ATS or downstream of panel X (EM branch circuits), that would be a way in which you would not be guaranteeing egress lighting in these areas. So then if you lost the normal lighting circuit in that area you would have a situation where there would be no lighting at all. Is this just accepted in the code as a "that's a very unlikely situation" or is this not allowed per code?
Can someone offer any clarification or point me in the right direction here?
Thanks,
- Drew