sandsnow
Senior Member
- Location
- Southern California
There are two gensets connected to parallelling gear.
There are multiple buildings on the site.
Each bldg has a 1200 amp (w/GFP) feeder from the parallelling gear.
On the load end of the feeder (in each bldg) is a distribution board.
Each dist. board feeds 3 XFR switches. One for emergency and two for optional standby.
The Emergency XFR switch shall be connected directly back to the parallelling gear. My corrx to the designer. 700-9(b)
If you think the system can remain as proposed, then what about the GFP of the feeder? The Code does not require GFP of emergency feeders, however it does not prohibit it. The Code only requires indication of a GFP on emergency feeder.
If you think the system could remain as propoesed, then you would not be thinking the feeder is an emergency feeder, right?
700-26 & 700-7(d)
Could the indication requirement even be complied with if GFP protection was provided?
Thoughts, comments, please?
There are multiple buildings on the site.
Each bldg has a 1200 amp (w/GFP) feeder from the parallelling gear.
On the load end of the feeder (in each bldg) is a distribution board.
Each dist. board feeds 3 XFR switches. One for emergency and two for optional standby.
The Emergency XFR switch shall be connected directly back to the parallelling gear. My corrx to the designer. 700-9(b)
If you think the system can remain as proposed, then what about the GFP of the feeder? The Code does not require GFP of emergency feeders, however it does not prohibit it. The Code only requires indication of a GFP on emergency feeder.
If you think the system could remain as propoesed, then you would not be thinking the feeder is an emergency feeder, right?
700-26 & 700-7(d)
Could the indication requirement even be complied with if GFP protection was provided?
Thoughts, comments, please?