mstrlucky74
Senior Member
- Location
- NJ
Have conduit that's in a concrete encased ductbank(indoors) and doesn't specify RGS or EMT. Spec says threadless fitting are not permitted to be embedded in concrete. So I guess you have t use RGS. Agree?
Not necessarily. There are compression fittings for EMT that are listed for use in concrete.
https://platt.com/platt-electric-su...?SectionID=9&GroupID=127&xType=Concrete+Tight
The spec may be in place to assure the conduit doesn't come apart during the pour, which with concrete pumps may be a concern.
A properly cemented and cured joint is pretty strong
plus the runs should be secured in place
Not necessarily. There are compression fittings for EMT that are listed for use in concrete.
https://platt.com/platt-electric-su...?SectionID=9&GroupID=127&xType=Concrete+Tight
IMO a compression fitting is still threadless fitting in this application.
Have conduit that's in a concrete encased ductbank(indoors) and doesn't specify RGS or EMT. Spec says threadless fitting are not permitted to be embedded in concrete. So I guess you have t use RGS. Agree?
IMO a compression fitting is still threadless fitting in this application.
I agree, if you cannot use a threadless then you must use a thread.
Along with other things, Schedule 80 PVC can be threaded. But I would generally assume RMC for bidding purposes unless I could get an answer. OR if I felt there might be review and price adjustment later, I would bid it with Schedule 80 and note it prominently in my proposal. It isn't worth losing money if you are forced to use RMC, but it might be the few dollars that gets you a second look.
Do there exist PVC couplings with female threads on both ends, that are listed for electrical applications?
There is no appearance of any variation of the word "thread" in Article 352.That I don't know, I just know the code references threading schedule 80. I have never done it.
There is no appearance of any variation of the word "thread" in Article 352.