JJWalecka
Senior Member
- Location
- New England
I was taught that, in concealed work, for the most part running MC is more efficient than EMT. With MC you have both raceway and conductors installed in one shot.
Say I was hypothetically quoted
100 feet of ? EMT @ almost thirty bucks
Fittings (couplings, connectors, unistrut clips) came out to almost twenty six bucks
500 feet of 12 thhn @ seventy five dollars
That?s $131.00 Now double that to compare to 1000 feet of MC
Total $262.00
1000 feet of 12/2 mc @ $363.00
Now Mc needs supports at smaller intervals so more supports are needed in this case unstrut, threaded rod and hardware.
Using the Mc would allow me to bring each whip directly to the four inch squares while the EMT raceway would have to go to a junction box then change to MC to feed the four inch squares.
The pricing doesn?t include junction boxes say a 10x10x4. It seems that EMT would be cheaper?
Why in the heck do I have it stuck in my head that MC is a cheaper install??
What?s everyone?s thoughts on this, at what point is it cheaper to run EMT than to use MC?
Say I was hypothetically quoted
100 feet of ? EMT @ almost thirty bucks
Fittings (couplings, connectors, unistrut clips) came out to almost twenty six bucks
500 feet of 12 thhn @ seventy five dollars
That?s $131.00 Now double that to compare to 1000 feet of MC
Total $262.00
1000 feet of 12/2 mc @ $363.00
Now Mc needs supports at smaller intervals so more supports are needed in this case unstrut, threaded rod and hardware.
Using the Mc would allow me to bring each whip directly to the four inch squares while the EMT raceway would have to go to a junction box then change to MC to feed the four inch squares.
The pricing doesn?t include junction boxes say a 10x10x4. It seems that EMT would be cheaper?
Why in the heck do I have it stuck in my head that MC is a cheaper install??
What?s everyone?s thoughts on this, at what point is it cheaper to run EMT than to use MC?