Could you explain the install in further detail? I can't see this not violating 300.3(B).
The EGC for a circuit is required to be run with the ungrounded conductors of that same circuit. A remote EGC is not permitted by the NEC rules. Are you really talking about an equipment grounding conductor?Wouldnt running the egc in a conduit defeat the purpose of some other entity been able to connect just about anywhere to the egc in the future. Unless you are runnig to a buss bar where it would be convenient for anyone to run thier egc to the buss bar and connect to it.
The EGC for a circuit is required to be run with the ungrounded conductors of that same circuit. A remote EGC is not permitted by the NEC rules. Are you really talking about an equipment grounding conductor?
Can you referance the article about the remote egc.
300.3(B)(2) Grounding and Bonding Conductors. Equipment grounding conductors shall be permitted to be installed outside a raceway or cable assembly where in accordance with the provisions of 250.130(C) for certain existing installations or in accordance with 250.134(B), Exception No. 2, for dc circuits. Equipment bonding conductors shall be permitted to be installed on the outside of raceways in accordance with 250.102(E).
The EGC for a circuit is required to be run with the ungrounded conductors of that same circuit. A remote EGC is not permitted by the NEC rules. Are you really talking about an equipment grounding conductor?
That still doesn't change the requirement that you run the EGC with the circuit conductors.From the OP it sounds to me like they plan to run a bare 4/0 along the station platform and if there are any future metal stuctures or equipt. that needs to be grounded they will have access to this 4/0 for said purpose :-?. Can you referance the article about the remote egc.
(B) Conductors of the Same Circuit. All conductors of the same circuit and, where used, the grounded conductor and all equipment grounding conductors and bonding conductors shall be contained within the same raceway, auxiliary gutter, cable tray, cablebus assembly, trench, cable, or cord, unless otherwise permitted in accordance with 300.3(B)(1) through (B)(4).
The client happens to be the AHJ as well on this project. Just confirmed that conduit is not needed.
Would'nt that constitute a conflict of intrest.
That still doesn't change the requirement that you run the EGC with the circuit conductors.
I have no idea what they intend this conductor to do, but it can't be the code required EGC.
Maybe, but between whom?
A conflict of interest (COI) occurs when an individual or organization is involved in multiple interests, one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation for an act in the other.
Sure, but which two (or more) are you thinking of?
He is the client for the project as well as the final say on the inspections (AHJ) is he not.
He is the client for the project as well as the final say on the inspections (AHJ) is he not.