ptonsparky
Tom
- Occupation
- EC - retired
Can someone tell me why expansion joints are used below a meter socket when it changes to direct bury cable 18" into the ground? Money maker?
Can someone tell me why expansion joints are used below a meter socket when it changes to direct bury cable 18" into the ground? Money maker?
Can someone tell me why expansion joints are used below a meter socket when it changes to direct bury cable 18" into the ground? Money maker?
In northern territories, building foundations are required to be at or below the frost line. Around my parts it is roughly 3' deep. This construction approach assumes the building will maintain relatively the same elevation year round.Can someone tell me why expansion joints are used below a meter socket when it changes to direct bury cable 18" into the ground? Money maker?
Some people act like sheep that can't think for themselves. I have a feeling someone's boss told the help they will use an expansion fitting for all UG laterals into meterbases and someone took that a little to far without thinking WHY it was needed. But, that's just a guess...
300.5(J) Earth Movement. Where direct-buried conductors, raceways, or cables are subject to movement by settlement or frost, direct-buried conductors, raceways, or cables shall be arranged so as to prevent damage to the enclosed con-ductors or to equipment connected to the raceways.
FPN: This section recognizes “S” loops in underground direct burial to raceway transitions, expansion fittings in raceway risers to fixed equipment, and, generally, the pro-vision of flexible connections to equipment subject to settlement or frost heaves.
In my area you there is a good chance you won't pass without one. Smart$ explained why.
Doesn't that section permit S loops with a short straight piece of conduit without the expansion fitting?
OK. In my area I do not see the problem as described unless the raceway 90s and continues on. That and if they pour concrete sidewalks that encases the raceway.
frostline? i think its more about relative movement and less about frostline. the meter is attached to building thus will not move relative to building, but the building itself (with attachments) will move relative to earth (regardless of frostline). bldg/item above frostline just means more relative movement, and, the riser will pass through that frostline zone, etc.
Yeah, frost line. What does someone from AZ know about frost line and remedial expansion joints? :blink: (rhetorical)frostline? i think its more about relative movement and less about frostline. the meter is attached to building thus will not move relative to building, but the building itself (with attachments) will move relative to earth (regardless of frostline). bldg/item above frostline just means more relative movement, and, the riser will pass through that frostline zone, etc.
300.5(J) doesnt call out expansive soils? this type of soil can be as bad as frost lifting, the big diff though, frost lift is like a solid, expansive soils usually swell only when wet, but they both can do damage. poco by me does not use expansion joint of relief method in expansive soil.
It's all about the fact the building is supported below the frost line and is pretty much stationary. Everything above the frost line is subject to movement from freezing and thawing.
If you want to dispute this knock yourself out. I have seen it happen again and again so I am not likely to change my view and neither are the words in the NECs FPN that tell us frost heaves are one of the reasons for the requirement.
Yeah, frost line. What does someone from AZ know about frost line and remedial expansion joints? :blink: (rhetorical)
300.5(J) doesn't call for expansion joints specifically as a remedy, or frost heave as a cause. Just one possible scenario...
i not disputing. what i am saying is, even if the foundation is below that frostline you still get relative movement between bldg and earth (a fact).
not 100% true. there will always be relative movement even when frostline is at zero inches. the amount of movement will likely be non-impacting to anything running in-ground up to the structure. you jumping inside the dwelling will cause relative movementPerhaps a little movement between the Earths core and the building but no movement between the building and utilities when both are below the frost line
Should have known you'd be a northern AZ'n (or familiar therewith). :lol:...
Frost Line – 30 inches into undisturbed soil for exterior footings in all areas of Coconino County
do i need to list them all ??
not 100% true. there will always be relative movement even when frostline is at zero inches. the amount of movement will likely be non-impacting to anything running in-ground up to the structure. you jumping inside the dwelling will cause relative movement
maybe the Q is more about a hard riser conduit that is smooth (like pvc) and is vertical between meter and reaches ~20" below frostline, why would you need an expansion joint as we would not think the earth would be able to lift on a smooth conduit, but in fact frozen earth can dig into objects to create lift points to exert force on.
not 100% true. there will always be relative movement even when frostline is at zero inches. the amount of movement will likely be non-impacting to anything running in-ground up to the structure. you jumping inside the dwelling will cause relative movement
maybe the Q is more about a hard riser conduit that is smooth (like pvc) and is vertical between meter and reaches ~20" below frostline, why would you need an expansion joint as we would not think the earth would be able to lift on a smooth conduit, but in fact frozen earth can dig into objects to create lift points to exert force on.