Re: Exterior egress lighting
The more I think about this the less sure I am about it. Doesn't it make sense for the exterior fixtures to come one when the lighting circuit for the adjacent interior space trips/dies/fails.
First we are only talking about a situation where the emergency fixtures are normally off. If the emergency fixtures are on photocell and burn all night, it doesn't make a difference what circuit they are connected to. There will be light outside the door no matter which circuits fail. However, if the exterior fixtures are normally off and come on only where the normal power is interrupted, wouldn't you want them to come on when the interior corridor lights fail.
Take this scenario. Office building with exits on all 4 sides and a corridor leads to each door. The question is does code require the exterior fixtures to be wired to one outside lighting circuit (option 1) or each fixture wired to the circuits for the connecting interior corridors (option 2).
In the option 1 scenario, If all exterior fixtures are on a dedicated exterior lighting circuit and its breaker trips, all batteries come on, all 4 fixtures burn. If interior corridor lighting circuit trips, the outside emerg lts do not come on.
In the option 2 scenario, if interior corridor lighting circuit trips, corridor emerg lights and outside point of egress lts comes on. Isn't that a safer system which is what we want?
700.12(F) says:
The branch circuit feeding the unit equipment shall be the same branch circuit that is serving the normal lighting in the area and connected ahead of any local switches.
Doesn't it make more sense to say the light outside the door is in the same area as the lights inside the door. As opposed to saying the light outside the door is in the same area as the lights on the other side of the building?
Jim / raider what do you think?