Relisys190
Member
- Location
- USA
- Occupation
- Building Operator
This was a message I sent to the manufacturer of Stabiloy ALCAN cable. Backstory, hurricane helene hit our commercial office building in Oct and we suffered an event within our main switch gear cabinet. We now know a phase to phase event occurred and the blast sent salt water up into the cabinet from the conduit under ground. Two conductors were damaged (found during Megger tests )
Insurance did not see the need to replace the gear , only test the 3000 amp breaker and re-install. Only replaced feeders that were damaged .. I need help here….
I operate a 12 story commercial property that was subjected to high levels of storm surge and water entered conduits of our tap box at ground level. There are two switch gears servicing this site, a single 3000 amp as well as a 1600 amp service both fed from the tap box adjacent to our utility transformer . All conductors are 750 MCM XHHW (Please see photo of 4 conductors that we replaced with size and name (stabiloy). There are 9 parallel runs to the 3000amp and 5 parallel runs to the 1600 amp.
We were instructed by an insurance inspector to replace only the conductors in one conduit that had a phase to phase event during the storm.
The rest of the existing conductors where Meggar tested following the storm, tested good and remained in place untouched albeit sitting in salt water filled conduits all of this time. We have been on generator power and I am curious of what the salt water has done over the last 6 months to the existing conductors insulation . The property has been on generator power during this time due to waiting on repairs. No power has been running through these conductors.
I am aware XHHW is “wet” rated but has the insulation been tested long term under salt water conditions ?
During a recent attempt to repower with utility they are seeing continuity across phases and our electrician believes the insulation may have broken down over time. Another more recent Meggar test may prove this theory .
Please respond ASAP as our contractor wanted to pull new conductors back in January prior but this was not approved by our insurance carrier per the forensics engineer who conducted the study said it was not required to replace them. Any help is appreciated !
Need your thoughts guys ! Thank you,
Markus
Insurance did not see the need to replace the gear , only test the 3000 amp breaker and re-install. Only replaced feeders that were damaged .. I need help here….
I operate a 12 story commercial property that was subjected to high levels of storm surge and water entered conduits of our tap box at ground level. There are two switch gears servicing this site, a single 3000 amp as well as a 1600 amp service both fed from the tap box adjacent to our utility transformer . All conductors are 750 MCM XHHW (Please see photo of 4 conductors that we replaced with size and name (stabiloy). There are 9 parallel runs to the 3000amp and 5 parallel runs to the 1600 amp.
We were instructed by an insurance inspector to replace only the conductors in one conduit that had a phase to phase event during the storm.
The rest of the existing conductors where Meggar tested following the storm, tested good and remained in place untouched albeit sitting in salt water filled conduits all of this time. We have been on generator power and I am curious of what the salt water has done over the last 6 months to the existing conductors insulation . The property has been on generator power during this time due to waiting on repairs. No power has been running through these conductors.
I am aware XHHW is “wet” rated but has the insulation been tested long term under salt water conditions ?
During a recent attempt to repower with utility they are seeing continuity across phases and our electrician believes the insulation may have broken down over time. Another more recent Meggar test may prove this theory .
Please respond ASAP as our contractor wanted to pull new conductors back in January prior but this was not approved by our insurance carrier per the forensics engineer who conducted the study said it was not required to replace them. Any help is appreciated !
Need your thoughts guys ! Thank you,
Markus