That is not what I said (and what Rob said just before me). The "connected" load is not defined by the size of the panel. You do not have a connected load of 650 amps here (i.e., 225+225+200). Tell us how many receptacle outlets are powered from these panels, and how many lights, and what AC or heating equipment, and what kitchen equipment (range, dishwasher, etc.), and what else gets its power from these panels. That is what comprises the "connected load." And you don't have to account for all of that being turned on at the same time. Article 220 gives you the method for determining the "calculated load."patpappas said:So even though the connected load more than adds up much higher than the secondary load of the transformer as long as the secondary is monitored it is fine?
charlie b said:
That is not what I said (and what Rob said just before me). The "connected" load is not defined by the size of the panel. You do not have a connected load of 650 amps here (i.e., 225+225+200). Tell us how many receptacle outlets are powered from these panels, and how many lights, and what AC or heating equipment, and what kitchen equipment (range, dishwasher, etc.), and what else gets its power from these panels. That is what comprises the "connected load." And you don't have to account for all of that being turned on at the same time. Article 220 gives you the method for determining the "calculated load."
patpappas said:I had an inspector add up breakers and tell me my connected load was higher than my feed...