yesterlectric
Senior Member
- Location
- PA
- Occupation
- Electrician
I normally see designs that require separate conduits for fiber and power conductors and for planning my work I think this is best. However, in looking into whether for a modification I can share them, I find the 2020 code to be less clear than is used to be.
1. Firstly, for fiber cable in conduit that originate and terminate outdoors, I don't see where the code says anything about whether these can be shared with electric light and power conductors. Part II covers outside fibers entering buildings, not those that originate and terminate in equipment on a customer premises outside of a building. Part V, and 770.133 has some allowances, but Part V is intended for wiring inside of buildings. So it seems there's nothing saying we can or can't do this.
2. Secondly, it seems in 2020, they removed the definition of conductive optical cables, while adding an allowance in 770.133 for conductive optical fiber cables with an overall sheath to be shared in the same raceway as power conductors. What happened to the definition? I understand (I think) the motivation for the rule but the removal of the definition seems not to help.
1. Firstly, for fiber cable in conduit that originate and terminate outdoors, I don't see where the code says anything about whether these can be shared with electric light and power conductors. Part II covers outside fibers entering buildings, not those that originate and terminate in equipment on a customer premises outside of a building. Part V, and 770.133 has some allowances, but Part V is intended for wiring inside of buildings. So it seems there's nothing saying we can or can't do this.
2. Secondly, it seems in 2020, they removed the definition of conductive optical cables, while adding an allowance in 770.133 for conductive optical fiber cables with an overall sheath to be shared in the same raceway as power conductors. What happened to the definition? I understand (I think) the motivation for the rule but the removal of the definition seems not to help.