One point that comes immediately to mind is there should be no overload protection...........
electrics said:
Yeah, also cited in some codes that transformer (if there is )should have no secondary protection...
That is not exactly true.
Short circuit protection is required, while the running overload protection needs to be above LRA.
The code book I have near me is from 2005.
695.4(B) discusses overcurrent protection being limited to providing short circuit protection only (sized per 430.62)
695.4(B)(1) is the first instance of the infamous 'rated to carry LRA indefinitely', which by the way is not applicable to the conductors.
695.5(B) deals with
dedicated transformers. It says secondary protection is not permitted, for the primary it is close to 695.4(B)(1).
695.(C)(2) deals with
non-dedicated transformers. In this case overcurrent protection is required but, again, it reads similar to 695.4(B)(1).