danbel57
Member
- Location
- Westchester, IL
Why is ground fault protection required for motors driven by VFD's ? Article 430.130
Substantiation: Currently, sections 430.52 and 430.53 describe the allowable
overcurrent protective devices for motor circuits and their ratings and settings.
While the existing text is adequate for electromechanical motor starting
equipment, adjustable speed drive controllers may have special requirements
that pertain to overcurrent protective devices.
New sections 430.130 and 430.131 are proposed to deal with the special
requirements of the adjustable speed drive controller overcurrent protection
functions. The proposed text contains both mandatory and informative
information on where to find the required overcurrent protection for a drive
controller as well as the rationale for adjustable speed drive controller
apparatus overcurrent protection requirements.
New section 430.130 (A)(3) is proposed to clarify that self-protected
combination controllers are only permitted when the listing of the power
conversion equipment specifically allows for protection by those devices. This
would prevent the application of 430.52 (c) (6) unless the drive controller has
been investigated specifically for use with self-protected combination
controllers.
Here is the substantiation for the code change in the 2014 NEC:
one reason I can think of is a gnd fault on the vfd output may be current limited and not trip an input cb
Anything that happens on the load side of the drive is not directly connected to the line side protection. The drive protects the load, the breaker or fuses are only there to protect the drive. Since 2005, UL listing of VFDs requires that the VFD now provides Short Circuit and Overload protection for the load connected to it.Thank you for your input. I was looking for an explanation other than what I was reading in the code, and you've given me some insight as to how these drives function. So, from what you're telling me, the drives by their design will not present the fault current that may actually be present, which would allow a normal breaker to trip.
I agree, and will say that the breaker or fuses are mostly there to protect the supply conductors, if the front end of the drive fails, it is usually toast anyway, fast acting fuse or breaker will only reduce how spectacular of a failure one may encounter.Anything that happens on the load side of the drive is not directly connected to the line side protection. The drive protects the load, the breaker or fuses are only there to protect the drive. Since 2005, UL listing of VFDs requires that the VFD now provides Short Circuit and Overload protection for the load connected to it.
:thumbsup:I agree, and will say that the breaker or fuses are mostly there to protect the supply conductors, if the front end of the drive fails, it is usually toast anyway, fast acting fuse or breaker will only reduce how spectacular of a failure one may encounter.