Hopefully some more data can stimulate a response. The hoods are located in a manufacturing facility. The lab is to test product and the hoods are located in a non-hazardous space. The units were supplied with explosion proof switches and receptacles (outside of the chamber hood), yet they are in the same space as normal fixtures, receptacles etc. So would the chemicals being used in the hood drive the rating per Article 500? If the chamber is a controlled environment, why would devices ouside the chamber need to be explosion proof if the lab is not a classified as a hazardous area?