mstrlucky74
Senior Member
- Location
- NJ
Is there a general rule or instances when one is used over another? Motors for example most of time have unfused disconnects. Thanks.
Is there a general rule or instances when one is used over another? Motors for example most of time have unfused disconnects. Thanks.
Keep in mind available fault current at the end of a long run isn't the same as it is at the start of the run, and the smaller the conductors are the more limiting effect they will have.If you already have the proper OCPD in a circuit, you don't need to duplicate it. For example a dedicated feeder CB in a panel going out to a machine, if the CB fits the protection requirements of the machine, but you want a local disconnect, you can use a non-fused disconnect.
One potential pitfall however is that NF disconnects are rarely rated for using on a circuit with more than 10kA fault current (i.e. they have an SCCR of 10kA), unless there are fuses ahead of them and they are the same fuses you would have used had it been a Fused disconnect. SOME NF disconnect manufacturers have had their series listed with their own circuit breakers, but even if so, it is a very specific series listing.
Keep in mind available fault current at the end of a long run isn't the same as it is at the start of the run, and the smaller the conductors are the more limiting effect they will have.
I run into that with motors as well. Partly because that motor that needs a 40 amp fuse to allow it to start would need a 60 amp fused switch to be able to accept the 40 amp fuse, but the motor current x 1.25 is still less then 30 so a 30 amp non fused disconnect will work unless the hp rating of the switch is too low (generally it isn't though).Generally unfused switches are rated at 100% of load current while fused discos are not. For example, if I am designing a PV system where the inverter output is 30A, I can use a 30A unfused disco if I have OCPD between it and the service, but if I have to have a fused disco it must be a 60A switch.