Electromatic
Senior Member
- Location
- Virginia
- Occupation
- Master Electrician
I'm so used to the dirt worshipers specifying extreme electrode systems that now I'm not given that, I'm doubting myself.
This project is a slab on grade, block (CMU) building (no structural steel). Power comes in as a feeder from another building (480V, 3Ø) to a 480V panel then immediately to a 480/208 transformer to a 208/120 panel. There is no electrode system shown in the riser/one-line. The only mentions of the GES are in a specification note saying,
and a transformer connection diagram showing a connection to,
"NEAREST GROUNDING ELECTRODE
PER 2017 NEC 250.30 (A) (4),
INCLUDING EXCEPTION NO. 1"
In addition, the incoming water line is not metal, and the slab will be poured with a fiber reinforcement mix--no rebar.
I'm thinking of throwing ≥20' of bare #4 Cu in the slab and calling it a day. Does that seem right? Is that still legitimate with a vapor barrier under the slab?
Thanks in advance.
This project is a slab on grade, block (CMU) building (no structural steel). Power comes in as a feeder from another building (480V, 3Ø) to a 480V panel then immediately to a 480/208 transformer to a 208/120 panel. There is no electrode system shown in the riser/one-line. The only mentions of the GES are in a specification note saying,
"PARTICULAR ATTENTION IS CALLED TO NEC ARTICLE 250.32(B)(1) (INCLUDING EXHIBIT 250.19) WHERE A REMOTE BUILDING IS FED FROM SERVICE EQUIPMENT OF ANOTHER BUILDING." |
and a transformer connection diagram showing a connection to,
"NEAREST GROUNDING ELECTRODE
PER 2017 NEC 250.30 (A) (4),
INCLUDING EXCEPTION NO. 1"
In addition, the incoming water line is not metal, and the slab will be poured with a fiber reinforcement mix--no rebar.
I'm thinking of throwing ≥20' of bare #4 Cu in the slab and calling it a day. Does that seem right? Is that still legitimate with a vapor barrier under the slab?
Thanks in advance.