GF protection on service disconnect for fire pumps

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

pisani168

Member
Location
Michigan
Occupation
EE
695 does not allow GF protection on FP equipment. I have a fire pump control panel feeding pumps and the panel has its own OCPD. The panel is fed off a utility transformer. The service entry disconnect has GF protection because the transformer fulfills the requirements outlined in 230. Is this a legal installation or does the GF protection need to be removed.

My guts says that it needs to be removed.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
The fire pump should be fed up-line of the premises service entry disconnect.
 
You are right. In this very case however, the fire pumps have their own service disconnect running independently from the service disconnect for the plant
 
pisani168 said:
You are right. In this very case however, the fire pumps have their own service disconnect running independently from the service disconnect for the plant
Click to expand...
OK, you may have to draw me a picture. If I understand, there are two service disconnects, one for the transformer (load side or line side?) and one for the fire pump(s). The fire pump disconnect is upstream of the transformer disconnect. If the fire pump disconnect is GF, it should be changed.
 
pisani168 said:
This is the worst drawing I ever made lol Hope it helps
Click to expand...
I think you are saying that the one on the right (DSC) has GFP and the fire pump on the left has no GFP. That's fine.
However, I wonder why you have a service disconnect at all for the fire pump. Typically service conductors are run directly to the service rated FP controller.
 
texie said:
I think you are saying that the one on the right (DSC) has GFP and the fire pump on the left has no GFP. That's fine.
However, I wonder why you have a service disconnect at all for the fire pump. Typically service conductors are run directly to the service rated FP controller.
Click to expand...
This is what I usually see as well, but a disconnect is permitted. It can't be grouped with the rest of the gear, and it has to be sized for the locked rotor current even if it isn't fused.
 
GFPE protection is not permitted in any fire pump power circuit.

Short circuit and ground fault protection is still required, it must be able to carry locked rotor current of the motor indefinitely.
 
gadfly56 said:
This is what I usually see as well, but a disconnect is permitted.
Click to expand...

I had a similar installation, the existing fire pump controller was not service entrance rated and the feeder was being relocated to a new service. Two outdoor disconnects were separated by several feet so the definition of grouping was never brought up. Maybe the locked-on and labeled disconnect made it okay.
 
jim dungar said:
I had a similar installation, the existing fire pump controller was not service entrance rated and the feeder was being relocated to a new service. Two outdoor disconnects were separated by several feet so the definition of grouping was never brought up. Maybe the locked-on and labeled disconnect made it okay.
Click to expand...
Why is being grouped an issue?
 
roger said:
They do not want it to accidently be shut off so installing it remote from the others makes it less likely to be.

Roger
Click to expand...
Roger, where is that in the NEC? 695.3(A)(1) mentions about not being in the same section of switchboard or enclosure but saying nothing about it being grouped with other service disconnects.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top