The code speaks specific to 15 and 20 amp 125volt GFCI protection for residential dwellings. Why is there nothing on 240volt and 30 amp GFCI protection or why is protection not required for the same areas at this voltage or amperage?
The code speaks specific to 15 and 20 amp 125volt GFCI protection for residential dwellings. Why is there nothing on 240volt and 30 amp GFCI protection or why is protection not required for the same areas at this voltage or amperage?
They will work as long as you don't attempt to use the feed-through terminals and just pigtail to the line terminals.This main ring 30 Amp wiring technique will not work on GFI because of the "looping" circular arrangement of receptacles. . . where the extreme end of the homerun goes back to where it started in the load center.
They will work as long as you don't attempt to use the feed-through terminals and just pigtail to the line terminals.
Unless I don't understand what the "main ring" is, I don't see the issue.Then you are defeating the purpose of the main ring.
Unless I don't understand what the "main ring" is, I don't see the issue.
I envision, using USA convention, an NM "home run" cable leaving a panel, running from box to box, and then a second, redundant home run back to the panel, and landing on the same terminals.
A double-ended-fed circuit where a singe break anywhere in the loop would not remove power from any part of the circuit.
Any receptacle would have power coming in from both cables entering the box. A switch (and its unswitched neutral) would simply tap into the circuit, but the loop would not exist after the switch.
I envision a GFCI receptacle being fed the same way; as a tap on the loop. You could still use the two-wire capability of each terminal.
Your scheme will work just like you would have a plug with a gfi protective feature. . .
not when using a circuit breaker at the load center.
Agreed. Again, why not?If you're saying that a GFI breaker wouldn't work in a ring circuit, why do you believe that to be true?
Your location [Nevis] indicates you are in BVI [British Virgin Islands] . It would be much easier to come up with an answer if you were in USVI [United States Virgin Islands.] St. Croix, St. John.
USVI use the NEC while BVI use the British wiring standard.
They are almost two different worlds in terms of electrical construction practices.
Being an inspector. . . you probably use the "main ring" wiring systems?
I noticed when you alluded to the 30 Amp general use branch circuit.
In our US system. . . we use the radial style wiring system for general use [wall plug] circuits where the British call "sockets".
This main ring 30 Amp wiring technique will not work on GFI because of the "looping" circular arrangement of receptacles. . . where the extreme end of the homerun goes back to where it started in the load center. The British engineers think this system saves copper. They needed copper in their war effort during WWII.
They use this system in Malaysia a former British territory rich in British culture.
Our friend from Jamaica may be able to share some additional guidance.
More places are probably coming where GFCI will be required. 2017 NEC had a significant change involving non dwelllings. Outside of ranges and clothes dryers, not too much else is cord and plug supplied at other than 15/20 amps/120 volts in typical dwelling, and GFCI is not a general requirement for non cord and plug connected equipment.The code speaks specific to 15 and 20 amp 125volt GFCI protection for residential dwellings. Why is there nothing on 240volt and 30 amp GFCI protection or why is protection not required for the same areas at this voltage or amperage?