SceneryDriver
Senior Member
- Location
- NJ
- Occupation
- Electrical and Automation Designer
I have an install where there is a 19" rack with a TrippLite UPS feeding various IT components (switch, server, router, etc...). The fiber modem is on the other side of the basement, and needs UPS backup as well. Simple solution: install a male cord cap and tail in the IT rack, and run UPS power to a receptacle at the fiber modem. This works just fine; fiber modem receptacle is color-coded and placarded so someone doesn't try to plug in a shop vac and trip the UPS.
The issue is that this is an unfinished basement. A dead-front GFCI was installed to protect the fiber modem receptacle, but it trips every time the UPS transfers to/from battery power. This obviously defeats the purpose of placing the modem on UPS power. The UPS in the rack is fed from a GFCI receptacle, and that receptacle holds just fine.
We've tried ferrites to help control any switching spikes, to no avail. Whatever the UPS is doing to the AC waveform, the dead-front GFCI doesn't like it. I suppose we could try something like a line reactor with more inductance than a ferrite choke to help control switching transients, but I'm hesitant to just shotgun parts at this.
A coworker argued that the dead-front GFCI isn't necessary, as the circuit is already GFCI protected by the receptacle feeding the UPS. For now, we removed the dead-front GFCI, and everything is working just fine. Thoughts?
SceneryDriver
The issue is that this is an unfinished basement. A dead-front GFCI was installed to protect the fiber modem receptacle, but it trips every time the UPS transfers to/from battery power. This obviously defeats the purpose of placing the modem on UPS power. The UPS in the rack is fed from a GFCI receptacle, and that receptacle holds just fine.
We've tried ferrites to help control any switching spikes, to no avail. Whatever the UPS is doing to the AC waveform, the dead-front GFCI doesn't like it. I suppose we could try something like a line reactor with more inductance than a ferrite choke to help control switching transients, but I'm hesitant to just shotgun parts at this.
A coworker argued that the dead-front GFCI isn't necessary, as the circuit is already GFCI protected by the receptacle feeding the UPS. For now, we removed the dead-front GFCI, and everything is working just fine. Thoughts?
SceneryDriver