Fireslayer47
Member
- Location
- Greenville, S.C. 20605
What is the reason for not installing a GFI outlet on a GFI protected circuit with circuit breaker?
What is the reason for not installing a GFI outlet on a GFI protected circuit with circuit breaker?
That is hogwash.
Disagree, it is balony. Possibly malarkey at best.
Poppycock.
Balderdash!
What is the reason for not installing a GFI outlet on a GFI protected circuit with circuit breaker?
What is the reason for not installing a GFI outlet on a GFI protected circuit with circuit breaker?
Along those same lines, GFCIs are required to be tested regularly. A LOT of homeowners will not open a CB panel to save their souls, so using a GFCI breaker will result in the testing not being performed. Using a GFCI receptacle with the little button right there in the kitchen or bathroom makes that less unlikely. I test mine monthly, usually inadvertently by plugging in my shaver or toothbrush charger with wet hands...Often its a waste of money to do it.
But there are a couple of occasions where redundancy, imo, would be better-like anything outdoor around water....boats docks marina etc- like I said just an opinion though-the gfci failure rate has improved fwiu, but it still does happen. Iwire had posted some info one time *I think* that had the exact percentages.
Other times, its better to have the gfci protection at the device, and not in a panel at all- I've heard here before that in comm kitchens its good to do it that way to keep restaurant staff from fumbling around in a panel.
Along those same lines, GFCIs are required to be tested regularly. A LOT of homeowners will not open a CB panel to save their souls, so using a GFCI breaker will result in the testing not being performed. Using a GFCI receptacle with the little button right there in the kitchen or bathroom makes that less unlikely. I test mine monthly, usually inadvertently by plugging in my shaver or toothbrush charger with wet hands...
Self testing GFCI outlets came about after I stopped doing any residential / commercial work, so I forgot about that.With the advent of the self testing receptacles, it's less of a problem now.
As to the OP's question, there's nothing wrong or against code for using two GFCI (or more) devices per circuit. Main issues is it's a waste of money and it can be more difficult to troubleshoot if one is unaware of the 2nd GFCI device.
Hmmm... now I'm wondering if the new self testing GFCI outlets will trip a GFCI breaker when they self test?
So the stupidity of doing so can be pointed out on an internet forum?What is the reason for not installing a GFI outlet on a GFI protected circuit with circuit breaker?
As to the OP's question, there's nothing wrong or against code for using two GFCI (or more) devices per circuit. Main issues is it's a waste of money and it can be more difficult to troubleshoot if one is unaware of the 2nd GFCI device.
It sure can. I once had a troubleshoot call for dead bedroom receptacles, and found three (yes, three) GFCI receptacles in the circuit, all wired feed-through. Egad! The tripped one was under a small table in the hallway. I suggested having me remove them, but they declined.
What is the reason for not installing a GFI outlet on a GFI protected circuit with circuit breaker?