Yeah, but I'm going to get some crap for relating it to you, but here goes anyhow. Put your finger on one of the meter leads, and if you're dealing with phantom voltage the meter reading will go to nil.danickstr said:does anyone have tricks for determining a ghost voltage on my digi meter that is faster than going to the vehicle to get the wiggy?
I sometimes wire in a device to see if it runs slowly, but I do not carry a wiggy just to check ghost voltages in travelers, too bulky.
mdshunk said:Yeah, but I'm going to get some crap for relating it to you, but here goes anyhow. Put your finger on one of the meter leads, and if you're dealing with phantom voltage the meter reading will go to nil.
Nope, which is why this method isn't really a good one on several fronts. Judicious use of this method is advised. Matter of fact, ignoring this method might be better advised. I know what I do, and you all can do whatever it is that you do.iwire said:If the reading on the meter said 90-100 volts would you be up for that? :grin:
danickstr said:in my case it is almost always 40 or less. i might trek to the parking area for higher readings![]()
How about a light bulb in a rubber socket?danickstr said:does anyone have tricks for determining a ghost voltage on my digi meter that is faster than going to the vehicle to get the wiggy?
Carry the wiggy and not the voltmeter?I sometimes wire in a device to see if it runs slowly, but I do not carry a wiggy just to check ghost voltages in travelers, too bulky.
mdshunk said:Yeah, but I'm going to get some crap for relating it to you, but here goes anyhow. Put your finger on one of the meter leads, and if you're dealing with phantom voltage the meter reading will go to nil.
Okay, I'm calling BS on this, since a neon will light up pretty darned quickly on 'phantom voltage'. That's the #1 reason I quit carrying one.RayS said:I carry a cheap neon tester also- not much space or weight in the belt, makes a good backup, and generally doesn't light up on a ghost.
roger said:Best idea yet.
Roger
76nemo said:Disagree. Look at Flukes 116 and 117, they are dual impedance DMM's. So is their 114, and 289.
The 289 has all the features needed except dishwashing:grin:
that is faster than going to the vehicle to get the wiggy?